Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effectiveness of a structured educational intervention using psychological delivery methods in children and adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the CASCADE intervention
  1. Deborah Christie1,
  2. Rebecca Thompson1,
  3. Mary Sawtell2,
  4. Elizabeth Allen3,
  5. John Cairns3,
  6. Felicity Smith4,
  7. Elizabeth Jamieson4,
  8. Katrina Hargreaves2,
  9. Anne Ingold2,
  10. Lucy Brooks3,
  11. Meg Wiggins2,
  12. Sandy Oliver2,
  13. Rebecca Jones3,
  14. Diana Elbourne3,
  15. Andreia Santos3,
  16. Ian C K Wong4,
  17. Simon O'Neil5,
  18. Vicki Strange2,
  19. Peter Hindmarsh1,
  20. Francesca Annan6,
  21. Russell M Viner7
  1. 1University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  2. 2Social Sciences Research Unit, Institute of Education, London, UK
  3. 3London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  4. 4UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK
  5. 5Diabetes UK, London, UK
  6. 6Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
  7. 7UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Deborah Christie; Deborah.Christie{at}uclh.nhs.uk

Abstract

Introduction Type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children and adolescents is increasing worldwide with a particular increase in children <5 years. Fewer than 1 in 6 children and adolescents achieve recommended glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values.

Methods A pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial assessed the efficacy of a clinic-based structured educational group incorporating psychological approaches to improve long-term glycemic control, quality of life and psychosocial functioning in children and adolescents with T1D. 28 pediatric diabetes services were randomized to deliver the intervention or standard care. 362 children (8–16 years) with HbA1c≥8.5% were recruited. Outcomes were HbA1c at 12 and 24 months, hypoglycemia, admissions, self-management skills, intervention compliance, emotional and behavioral adjustment, and quality of life. A process evaluation collected data from key stakeholder groups in order to evaluate the feasibility of delivering the intervention.

Results 298/362 patients (82.3%) provided HbA1c at 12 months and 284/362 (78.5%) at 24 months. The intervention did not improve HbA1c at 12 months (intervention effect 0.11, 95% CI −0.28 to 0.50, p=0.584), or 24 months (intervention effect 0.03, 95% CI −0.36 to 0.41, p=0.891). There were no significant changes in remaining outcomes. 96/180 (53%) families in the intervention arm attended at least 1 module. The number of modules attended did not affect outcome. Reasons for low uptake included difficulties organizing groups and work and school commitments. Those with highest HbA1cs were less likely to attend. Mean cost of the intervention was £683 per child.

Conclusions Significant challenges in the delivery of a structured education intervention using psychological techniques to enhance engagement and behavior change delivered by diabetes nurses and dietitians in routine clinical practice were found. The intervention did not improve HbA1c in children and adolescents with poor control.

Trial registration number ISRCTN52537669, results.

  • Adolescent Diabetes
  • Education and Behavioral Interventions
  • Psychology
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.