Table 2

Baseline characteristics of patients with NFG, IFG, and T2DM

NFG at baseline (n=124)IFG at baseline (n=107)T2DM at baseline (n=108)p Value
Age (years)62.5±10.363.6±10.162.7±9.70.708
Sex (female)48 (38.71%)27 (25.23%)33 (30.56%)0.085
Hypertension (WHO)56 (45.16%)64 (59.81%)56 (51.85%)0.085
History of smoking70 (56.45%)61 (57.01%)72 (66.67%)0.218
Coronary artery stenosis >50%71 (57.26%)65 (60.75%)74 (68.52%)0.202
MetS ATP III Definition26(20.97%)44 (41.12%)*77 (71.3%)*§1.01E-13
BMI26.4±4.627.3±428.2±4.30.006
Waist circumference (cm)91.9±1297±10.799.4±12.2*9.54E-06
Waist-to-hip ratio0.9±0.11±0.11±0.1*1.60E-04
Cholesterol (mmol/L)5.6±1.15.7±15.4±1.20.133
LDL (mmol/L)3.4±0.83.5±0.83.1±0.90.001
HDL (mmol/L)1.3±0.41.3±0.41.1±0.40.001
Triglycerides (mmol/L)1.7±1.11.7±0.82.3±1.7*3.39E-05
Glucose (mmol/L)5.3±0.96.2±0.5*8.9±2.8*§7.81E-55
HbA1c (%)5.8±0.55.9±0.57.5±1.4*4.44E-44
Insulin (µU/mL)9.4±13.512.9±10.5*15.4±11.8*§2.39E-08
HOMA-IR1.9±1.23.6±3.1*5.9±4.9*§3.64E-23
Systolic BP133.3±22.7138.7±21.3139.6±220.040
Diastolic BP77.9±12.679.7±11.279.2±13.90.457
CRP0.7±1.10.9±1.71±1.20.058
Serum potassium4.4±0.44.3±0.44.5±0.50.070
Creatinine (mg/dL)1.2±0.91.1±0.21.2±0.40.640
GFR (Mayo)86.2±19.786.8±17.384.7±22.40.496
Diuretics33 (26.61%)35 (32.71%)50 (46.3%)0.006
Antihypertensive drugs93 (75%)87 (81.31%)96 (88.89%)0.025
Lipid-lowering drugs58 (46.77%)49 (45.79%)62 (57.41%)0.162
Plasma sphingolipids
C16SO (µmol/L)15.26±6.4614.67±4.3814.5±5.030.695
C16SA (µmol/L)0.44±0.260.48±0.210.49±0.230.096
C17SO (µmol/L)8.11±37.74±2.437.31±2.380.165
C18PhytoSO (µmol/L)0.12±0.050.11±0.040.11±0.040.792
C18SAdiene (µmol/L)28.64±8.5727.21±6.8626.01±7.680.033
C18SO (µmol/L)94.56±22.1492.67±19.2990.3±19.850.250
C18SA (µmol/L)3.16±1.443.38±1.153.7±1.690.027
C19SO (µmol/L)2.88±1.332.82±1.152.62±1.080.262
C20SO (µmol/L)0.17±0.060.18±0.050.18±0.050.028
C20SA (µmol/L)0.02±0.010.03±0.010.03±0.02*1.33E-05
1-deoxySO (µmol/L)0.14±0.10.17±0.090.22±0.14*2.22E-06
1-deoxySA (µmol/L)0.07±0.050.08±0.030.09±0.050.001
  • Values are shown as mean ±SD for the continuous variables and numbers and percentage of total for the categorical variables. p Values were calculated using the ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni correction on the log transformed continuous variables. For the categorical variables, the p value was calculated using the χ2 test. Variables in bold font have significant differences after the Bonferroni correction (p=4.1×10−4). The three groups were compared with each other.

  • *Represent a significant difference from NFG.

  • §Represents a significant difference from IFG.

  • ANOVA, analysis of variance; ATP, Adult Treatment Panel; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C reaction protein; GFR (Mayo) Glomerular filtration rate (Mayo equation); Hb, hemoglobin; HbA1c, glycated Hb; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, Homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MetS, metabolic syndrome; NFG, normal fasting glucose; SA, sphinganine; SO, sphingosine; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.