Table 1

Probability (percentage, 95% CI) of finding undiagnosed diabetes among the US population without diagnosed diabetes aged ≥18 years, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), 1999–2014*

1999–20022003–20062007–20102011–2014P value †
n=3974n=3778n=4562n=4330
Crude estimates
Total3.3 (2.8–4.0)3.2 (2.5–4.0)3.7 (3.1–4.3)3.2 (2.7–3.8)0.83
Age group (years)
 18–441.2 (0.6–2.1)1.1 (0.6–1.8)1.1 (0.7–1.5)1.3 (0.9–2.0)0.91
 45–645.0 (3.6–6.7)3.9 (2.6–5.7)4.4 (3.2–5.9)4.9 (3.8–6.3)0.60
 ≥657.8 (5.9–10.4)8.9 (6.5–12.2)10.9 (8.6–13.7)5.6 (3.9–7.9)0.04
Age-standardized estimates ‡
Total3.4 (2.9–4.1)3.3 (2.6–4.1)3.7 (3.2–4.4)3.1 (2.6–3.8)0.52
Sex
 Men4.2 (3.3–5.2)4.4 (3.3–5.8)5.0 (4.1–6.1)3.7 (2.8–5.0)0.39
 Women2.9 (2.2–3.7)2.2 (1.5–3.1)2.6 (2.0–3.4)2.6 (2.0–3.4)0.63
Race/ethnicity§
 Non-Hispanic white3.2 (2.6–3.9)2.9 (2.1–4.1)3.1 (2.5–3.7)2.2 (1.7–2.9)0.02
 Non-Hispanic black5.3 (3.9–7.3)4.6 (3.6–5.7)6.5 (5.1–8.3)5.5 (3.9–7.6)0.50
 Mexican-American3.7 (2.4–5.5)4.7 (3.5–6.3)7.0 (5.0–9.6)6.0 (4.0–8.9)0.01
Education
 <High school5.5 (4.3–7.1)4.2 (3.0–6.0)4.5 (3.6–5.6)4.9 (3.6–6.7)0.96
 High school graduate3.2 (2.2–4.7)4.3 (3.0–6.1)5.3 (4.0–7.0)3.7 (2.9–4.9)0.69
 >High school2.6 (1.9–3.6)2.5 (1.7–3.5)2.7 (2.0–3.5)2.4 (1.8–3.3)0.92
Poverty-income ratio tertile¶
 Lowest4.7 (3.6–6.3)4.1 (3.2–5.3)4.0 (3.2–5.1)4.6 (3.7–5.8)0.83
 Middle3.3 (2.3–4.7)3.3 (2.1–5.2)3.9 (2.9–5.3)3.0 (2.2–4.3)0.69
 Highest2.4 (1.7–3.5)1.8 (0.9–3.4)3.2 (2.3–4.4)1.5 (0.9–2.5)<0.05
  • *Two NHANES cycles were combined, yielding more precise, 4-year prevalence estimates.

  • values for trend were estimated from linear regression models by using variance weighted least squares with 2-year survey cycle as the independent variable.

  • ‡Prevalence estimates were age-standardized to the 2000 US standard population by using age groups 18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years.

  • §Prevalence estimates for participants who self-reported as other race/ethnicity were not presented because of small numbers, but their data are included in other estimates.

  • ¶Data on poverty-income ratio were missing for 1292 participants.