Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in coronary plaque composition and burden detected in symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomographic angiography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We assessed gender differences in coronary plaque burden and composition amongst symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). Over all, 916 symptomatic patients who were referred for a clinically indicated CCTA were included in the study. CCTAs were interpreted on a per-segment basis for plaque composition (non-calcified, calcified, or mixed) and stenosis severity. A stenosis of ≥50 % was considered obstructive coronary artery disease. Among 916 patients, 498 (54.3 %) patients were women. Obstructive stenosis was found in 11 % of women compared to 21 % of men (p < 0.0001). Men had significantly higher plaque prevalence, 67.9 % versus 51.6 % in women (unadjusted OR 1.98; 95 % CI, 1.51–2.60). This remained significant after adjusting for age and potential confounders (adjusted OR 2.96; 95 % CI, 2.01–4.36). A similar relationship existed for all three plaque subtypes. Men were also more likely to have mixed plaque burden (adjusted OR 1.24; 95 % CI, 1.08–1.43) than women without any significant differences in regards to the other plaque sub-types. In conclusion, symptomatic women have a lower prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease and are less likely to have mixed coronary plaque compared to symptomatic men. Future studies are needed to determine the prognostic implications of these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tejada C, Strong JP, Montenegro MR, Restrepo C, Solberg LA (1968) Distribution of coronary and aortic atherosclerosis by geographic location, race, and sex. Lab Invest 18(5):509–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanecek R (1976) Atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries in five towns. Bull World Health Organ 53(5–6):509–518

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kagan AR (1976) Aortic, coronary, and myocardial lesions in relation to various factors. Bull World Health Organ 53(5–6):605–614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong CC, Froelicher ES, Bacchetti P et al (1997) Influence of gender on cardiovascular mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients with high indication for coronary angiography. Circulation 96(9 Suppl):II-51–II-57

    Google Scholar 

  5. Janghorbani M, Jones RB, Gilmour WH, Hedley AJ, Zhianpour M (1994) A prospective population based study of gender differential in mortality from cardiovascular disease and “all causes” in asymptomatic hyperglycaemics. J Clin Epidemiol 47(4):397–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Janghorbani M, Hedley AJ, Jones RB, Zhianpour M, Gilmour WH (1993) Gender differential in all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. Int J Epidemiol 22(6):1056–1063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Center of Health Statistics, Center of Disease Control and Prevention (2011) Compressed mortality file: underlying cause of death 1999–2007. http://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D53;jsessionid=AA2E1047F77279B9FF7ECBE3C0F7E85C. Accessed 10/04/2011

  8. Ayala C, Croft JB, Greenlund KJ et al (2002) Sex differences in US mortality rates for stroke and stroke subtypes by race/ethnicity and age, 1995–1998. Stroke 33(5):1197–1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lerner DJ, Kannel WB (1986) Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J 111(2):383–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barrett-Connor E (1997) Sex differences in coronary heart disease. Why are women so superior? The 1995 Ancel Keys Lecture. Circulation 95(1):252–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann H, Frieler K, Hamm B, Dewey M (2008) Intra- and interobserver variability in detection and assessment of calcified and non-calcified coronary artery plaques using 64-slice computed tomography: variability in coronary plaque measurement using MSCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24(7):735–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Papadopoulou SL, Neefjes LA, Schaap M, et al (2011) Detection and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by 64-slice multidetector CT: a systematic head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Atherosclerosis 219(1):163–170

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blaha MJ, Nasir K, Rivera JJ et al (2009) Gender differences in coronary plaque composition by coronary computed tomography angiography. Coron Artery Dis 20(8):506–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nasir K, Gopal A, Blankstein R et al (2010) Noninvasive assessment of gender differences in coronary plaque composition with multidetector computed tomographic angiography. Am J Cardiol 105(4):453–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A et al (2004) Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 233(3):817–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schartl M, Bocksch W, Koschyk DH et al (2001) Use of intravascular ultrasound to compare effects of different strategies of lipid-lowering therapy on plaque volume and composition in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 104(4):387–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong YJ, Jeong MH, Choi YH et al (2010) Gender differences in coronary plaque components in patients with acute coronary syndrome: virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Cardiol 56(2):211–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Qian J, Maehara A, Mintz GS et al (2009) Impact of gender and age on in vivo virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound imaging plaque characterization (from the global virtual histology intravascular ultrasound [VH-IVUS] registry). Am J Cardiol 103(9):1210–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Koops A, Ittrich H, Petri S et al (2007) Multicontrast-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaques at 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla: ex vivo comparison with histopathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 17(1):279–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw LJ, Hendel RC, Cerquiera M et al (2005) Ethnic differences in the prognostic value of stress technetium-99 m tetrofosmin gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 45(9):1494–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D et al (2004) Detection of calcified and non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 109(1):14–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeina AR, Odeh M, Rosenschein U, Zaid G, Barmeir E (2008) Coronary artery disease among asymptomatic diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. Coron Artery Dis 19(1):37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim S, Choi SH, Choi EK et al (2009) Comprehensive evaluation of coronary arteries by multidetector-row cardiac computed tomography according to the glucose level of asymptomatic individuals. Atherosclerosis 205(1):156–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao Y, Lu B, Sun ML et al (2011) Comparison of atherosclerotic plaque by computed tomography angiography in patients with and without diabetes mellitus and with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 108(6):809–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bamberg F, Dannemann N, Shapiro MD et al (2008) Association between cardiovascular risk profiles and the presence and extent of different types of coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by multidetector computed tomography. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 28(3):568–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sunman H, Yorgun H, Canpolat U et al (2011) Association between family history of premature coronary artery disease and coronary atherosclerotic plaques shown by multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol (in press)

  28. Rivera JJ, Nasir K, Cox PR et al (2009) Association of traditional cardiovascular risk factors with coronary plaque sub-types assessed by 64-slice computed tomography angiography in a large cohort of asymptomatic subjects. Atherosclerosis 206(2):451–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Kastrati A, Martinoff S, Schomig A (2006) Prevalence of non-calcified coronary plaques by 64-slice computed tomography in patients with an intermediate risk for significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(2):312–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Virani SS, Catellier DJ, Pompeii LA et al (2011) Relation of cholesterol and lipoprotein parameters with carotid artery plaque characteristics: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) carotid MRI study. Atherosclerosis 219(2):596–602

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vavere AL, Arbab-Zadeh A, Rochitte CE et al (2011) Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification—A subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. Radiology 261(1):100–108

    Google Scholar 

  32. Min JK, Edwardes M, Lin FY et al (2011) Relationship of coronary artery plaque composition to coronary artery stenosis severity: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY trial. Atherosclerosis 219(2):573–578

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mouaz H. Al-Mallah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qureshi, W., Blaha, M.J., Nasir, K. et al. Gender differences in coronary plaque composition and burden detected in symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29, 463–469 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0098-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0098-1

Keywords

Navigation