The association between Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale scores and glycemic control is modified by types of diabetes therapy: Diabetes Distress and Care Registry in Tenri (DDCRT 2)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2012.04.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the joint association of Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale scores and glycemic control with diabetes therapy.

Methods

We used 3479 patients’ data with type 1 and type 2. Modified Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) for poor glycemic control (HbA1c  7.0%) across quartiles of PAID scores.

Results

Compared with the 1st quartile of PAID score, multivariable-adjusted RRs for poor glycemic control were 0.99 (95%CI, 0.87–1.11), 1.05 (95%CI, 0.93–1.18), and 1.12 (95%CI, 1.00–1.27), respectively, for 2nd to 4th quartiles, and we observed significant trend (p for trend = 0.03). We observed significant interaction of PAID score and HbA1c with diabetes therapy (p = 0.0469). In patients receiving diet only therapy, the RRs for poor glycemic control were 1.38 (95%CI, 0.93–2.05), 1.18 (95%CI, 0.51–5.13), and 1.81 (95%CI, 1.16–2.79), respectively for 2nd to 4th quartiles of PAID score compared with the 1st quartile (p for trend = 0.025); while we did not observe significant association between PAID and poor glycemic control in patients receiving medication therapy.

Conclusions

Diabetes distress measured by PAID survey was associated with poor glycemic control, and this association was modified by diabetes therapy.

Introduction

Diabetes is a chronic medical illness that requires careful adherence to a daily treatment that can be complex and demanding. For patients with diabetes, treatment can have a significant impact on many aspects of quality of life. However, the association between glycemic control and patient-reported outcomes (both generic and diabetes-specific) is complex and little research has been done in this area. Diabetes-related emotional distress is an important element of diabetes quality of life that may influence adherence to self-care, glycemic control. Polonsky et al. developed the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Scale to measure emotional distress in patients with diabetes, and they revealed that PAID scores vary by such as treatment modality, and correlate with glycemic control in patients with diabetes [1]. Despite considerable research in this specific field, previous researches have not yet addressed if the magnitude of association between PAID scores and glycemic control may vary by patients’ characteristics or treatment modality. Especially, our hypothesis is that the association between PAID scores may vary by treatment modality: diabetes related distress plays a more important role in diabetes care of patients without medication therapy than those with, because diabetes related distress is associated with poor adherence to diabetes related self-care [2], and the magnitude of influence of self-care towards diet and exercise on glycemic control might vary depending on the type of therapy (diet therapy, oral medication or insulin). Evaluating our hypothesis will provide deeper insight into the relationship between glycemic control and patient-reported outcomes.

Primary objective of this study is to evaluate the joint association of PAID scores and glycemic control with diabetes therapy using a large, single-center registry of patients with diabetes. Secondarily, we evaluated the joint association with other patients’ characteristics.

Section snippets

Study sample

We used data from a diabetes research and care registry for patients who are cared at Tenri Hospital, a regional tertiary care teaching hospital in Nara, Japan. We registered all patients who visited outpatient clinic of the Diabetes Center from October 2009 to August 2010 who were already diagnosed by diagnostic criteria of Japan Diabetes Society (JDS). Patients with impaired glucose tolerance were not included in this study. At registry, self-administered survey were distributed to patients

Results

Between October 2009 and August 2010, 5133 patients with diabetes visited our hospital, of which 81 patients were ineligible because of dementia (n = 15), mental retardation (n = 6), schizophrenia (n = 3), severe major depression (n = 2), visual disturbances (n = 35), poor general condition (n = 3), or other comorbidities (n = 17). Of eligible 5052 patients, 3898 (77.2%) patients consented to participate in the study. We excluded 158 patients who had diabetes other than type 1 or type 2 for the current

Discussion

This is the largest-scale study to evaluate the association between PAID score and glycemic control in a sample of Asian population with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Consistent with the previous reports [1], [8], [9], [10], we observed significant positive association between higher PAID score and poor glycemic control. Large-scale sample-size allowed us to examine the joint association of PAID score and HbA1c with other patients’ characteristics; our study also revealed that the association

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Manpei Suzuki Diabetes Foundation. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Members of the Diabetes Distress and Care Registry in Tenri Study Group: Hitoshi Ishii, Shintaro Okamura, Tsuyoshi Mashitani, Miyuki Furuya, Masako Kitatani, Satoshi Matsunaga, Naotaka Fujita, Rie Kurokawa, Hirohito Kuwata (Department of

References (15)

  • G.S. Dhatt et al.

    HbA1c: a comparison of NGSP with IFCC transformed values

    Clin Chim Acta

    (2005)
  • W.H. Polonsky et al.

    Assessment of diabetes-related distress

    Diabetes Care

    (1995)
  • K. Weinger et al.

    Measuring diabetes self-care: a psychometric analysis of the Self-Care Inventory-Revised with adults

    Diabetes Care

    (2005)
  • H. Ishii

    Psycho-behavioral problems in diabetes treatment

    J Jpn Diab Soc

    (2000)
  • Executive summary: standards of medical care in diabetes

    Diabetes Care

    (2011)
  • L.A. McNutt et al.

    Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2003)
  • G. Zou

    A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2004)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

1

Members of the Diabetes Distress and Care Registry in Tenri Study Group are listed in “Acknowledgement” section.

View full text