You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 10, Issue 1
  • Real-world weight change, adherence, and discontinuation among patients with type 2 diabetes initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the UK

Article Text

Article menu
Emerging technologies, pharmacology and therapeutics
Real-world weight change, adherence, and discontinuation among patients with type 2 diabetes initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the UK
  1. Tracey Weiss1,
  2. Lingfeng Yang1,
  3. Richard D Carr1,2,
  4. Sampriti Pal3,
  5. Baanie Sawhney3,
  6. Robert Boggs1,
  7. Swapnil Rajpathak1,
  8. Kristy Iglay1
  1. 1Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA
  2. 2University College London, London, UK
  3. 3Complete HEOR Solutions, North Wales, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Tracey Weiss; tracey.weiss{at}merck.com

Abstract

Introduction Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are a type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment with demonstrated weight loss benefits in clinical trials. However, the extent to which real-world patients with T2DM achieve clinically meaningful weight loss (≥5%) has not been well characterized. Analysis of real-world data suggests adherence to injectable GLP-1 RAs is suboptimal and discontinuation following the first year of therapy is poorly characterized.

Research design and methods A retrospective cohort study among patients with T2DM initiating injectable GLP-1 RA therapy was conducted using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink that includes primary care medical records for 13 million patients in the UK. This study assessed weight change, adherence (proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥80%), and discontinuation (≥90-day gap between prescriptions) at 12 and 24 months during the study period spanning January 2009–December 2017.

Results Among 589 patients initiating a GLP-1 RA, 56.4% were female and the median age was 54 years (IQR (46, 61)). The median body mass index was 41.2 kg/m2 (IQR (35.8, 46.4)). Among patients with weight measures available (n=341 at 12 months; n=232 at 24 months), 33.4% and 43.5% achieved weight loss ≥5% of baseline weight at 12 and 24 months, respectively. At 12 and 24 months, 64.5% and 59.2% were adherent, and 45.2% and 64.7% discontinued, respectively.

Conclusions A minority of patients initiating GLP-1 RAs achieved ≥5% weight loss, suggesting the real-world benefit of these agents on weight loss may be lower than that observed in clinical trials. Patients on GLP-1 RAs may benefit from additional support to improve long-term adherence.

  • adherence
  • weight change
  • diabetes mellitus
  • type 2

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Merck licensed the data used in this study and does not have permission to release the data or share with any third party without explicit contractual consent. The study protocol contains specifications of the database and patient selection. The study protocol is available on request.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002517

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Significance of this study

    What is already known about this subject?

    • Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have demonstrated weight loss in clinical trial participants, although weight loss is poorly characterized among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the real world.

    • Adherence and discontinuation of GLP-1 RAs after 1 year is also poorly characterized.

    What are the new findings?

    • Among patients with weight measures available, 33.4% and 43.5% achieved clinically meaningful weight loss ≥5% of baseline weight at 12 and 24 months, respectively.

    • At 24 months, 59.2% and 64.7% of patients with T2DM were adherent to or discontinued GLP-1 RA therapy, respectively.

    • Median time to discontinuation of GLP-1 RA therapy was 426 days.

    How might these results change the focus of research or clinical practice?

    • This study suggests real-world weight loss benefit of these drugs may be lower than observed in clinical trials and a substantial portion of patients with T2DM on GLP-1 RAs do not adhere to or discontinue therapy within 2 years.

    • Patients may benefit from additional support to improve more long-term adherence to GLP-1 RAs.

    Introduction

    In the UK, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) doubled from 2.39/1000 person-years in 2000 to 5.32/1000 person-years in 2013.1 Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and obesity co-occur frequently among patients with T2DM. A national estimate from 2018 indicated that 35% of patients with T2DM had CVD.2 T2DM, obesity, and CVD increase the likelihood of other comorbidities, including hypertension, chronic kidney disease, metabolic disorders, and liver disease.3

    Current guidelines from the American Diabetes Association recommend a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor as second-line therapy following metformin for patients with T2DM with elevated risk of or current CVD, regardless of baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), or a clinical need to minimize weight gain or promote weight loss.4 The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK recommends GLP-1 RAs for individuals with T2DM if triple therapy with metformin and two other oral drugs in ineffective, not tolerated or contraindicated and they have a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 or, if they have a lower BMI, in whom weight loss would benefit other significant comorbidities; NICE recommends GLP-1 RAs only be continued after 6 months among those who demonstrate a reduction of 11 mmol/mol or greater in HbA1c and weight loss of 3% or greater of initial body weight.5 These recommendations stem from the demonstrated weight loss and cardiovascular benefits in clinical trials.4 Notably, the LEADER (Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results) clinical trial enrolled patients with T2DM with history of, or who were at high risk of, CVD and followed them for a median of 3.8 years; patients on liraglutide lost 2.3 kg more and were less likely (HR 0.87, 95% CI (0.78 to 0.97)) to experience cardiovascular events (13%) than patients receiving a placebo and standard of care (14.9%).6

    Efficacy of medications observed in clinical trials, however, often exceeds the real-world effectiveness, due in part to patients’ lower adherence and discontinuation of therapy, as well as the lack of representativeness among clinical trial participants.7 Participants in clinical trials tend to be more motivated and have resources and support to comply with the treatment regimens under investigation.8

    Although randomized trials of GLP-1 RA have demonstrated clinically meaningful weight loss, weight change has not been widely characterized using real-world data among patients naïve to GLP-1 RA therapy.9 10 Real-world data on adherence and persistence tends to focus on the initial limited time frames of 6–12 months of therapy. Furthermore, GLP-1 RAs are known to cause gastrointestinal disturbances, and while these effects may subside after initial use, they have been shown to negatively impact adherence and persistence.11 12 Conversely, an analysis of real-world data in the USA showed that modest weight loss after initiating GLP-1 RAs may increase patient adherence.10

    This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with T2DM newly prescribed GLP-1 RAs in the UK to characterize weight change and evaluate adherence and discontinuation after 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Differences in the distributions of weight change, adherence and discontinuation by gender, age, baseline BMI, and dosing frequency were also examined.

    Methods

    Study design

    Data were extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) database13 managed by the UK’s Department of Health. The CPRD database is a longitudinal database of de-identified patient data from a network of general practitioner practices across the UK. It includes 13 million registered patients with data that include demographics, disease diagnoses, clinical data, laboratory tests, and prescriptions. CPRD is validated and recognized as representative of general physician clinical care and the UK general population.13

    The study period spans from January 1, 2009 until December 31, 2017. The index date was defined as the first prescription for an injectable GLP-1 RA as monotherapy or dual-therapy with metformin following an observed 12-month baseline period (online supplemental figure 1).

    Supplemental material

    Selection and description of participants

    Included patients were at least 18 years of age and diagnosed with T2DM during the baseline period based on Read/Med codes used in the CPRD database (online supplemental table 1). Patients were required to have continuous medical records for the 12-month baseline period and for at least 12 months following the index date. Patients were excluded if they: (1) were diagnosed with other forms of diabetes including type 1, gestational, or other secondary diabetes, (2) were pregnant at any time during the study period or, (3) had prescriptions for antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs) other than metformin during the previous 90 days or 30 days following the first GLP-1 RA prescription (in order to minimize the noise of polypharmacy on assessment of weight change, adherence, and discontinuation). Weight was assessed among those with weight measures available. Adherence was assessed among patients with at least two GLP-1 RA prescription fills (online supplemental figure 2).

    Technical information

    Weight change

    Clinically meaningful weight loss was defined as weight loss ≥5% of the patient’s baseline weight.14 The patients’ baseline weight was the baseline period measure prior to and closest to the index date. Weights within a 90-day window of the 12-month and 24-month follow-up dates served as end points. If multiple weight measures were available, the weight closest to the relevant follow-up date was used. Patients were classified into the following BMI categories: BMI <30 kg/m2; 30–34.9 kg/m2; 35–39.9 kg/m2; 40–44.9 kg/m2; and BMI≥45 kg/m2.

    Adherence

    The proportion of days covered (PDC) methodology served as the assessment for adherence.15 PDC was defined as the number of days covered by a GLP-1 RA prescription divided by the number of days during the measurement period. If days of supply were not available, a 30-day supply was assumed. The measurement periods were defined as the time from the index date until the end of 12 months and 24 months, discontinuation of GLP-1 RA medication, or database exit, whichever came first. Patients were classified as adherent if the PDC was ≥0.80 at these time points. Adherence was only measured in patients with two or more GLP-1 RA prescription fills.

    Discontinuation

    Discontinuation of therapy was defined as having at least a 90-day gap between the last date of a supply of a GLP-1 RA and the first date of subsequent prescriptions (if any). Switching drug brands of GLP-1 RA did not constitute discontinuation unless >90 days elapsed between prescriptions. Patients who exited the database were censored and not assumed to have discontinued therapy. If days of supply were not available in the database, a 30-day supply was assumed. A sensitivity analysis defining discontinuation as a treatment gap >120 days was performed.

    Patient characteristics

    Age, gender, relevant comorbidities, including macrovascular and microvascular complications, laboratory results, BMI, and prescribed GLP-1 RA dosing frequency (weekly, daily) are listed in table 1. Comorbidities were identified during the 12 months prior to the index date and determined from Read codes present in the database or clinical data documented in the record. If a code was not present, patients were classified with hypertension if the medical record included a measure of systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg. Chronic kidney disease was defined based on Read code or having an assessment of estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73m2. Hyperlipidemia was defined based on Read code or as a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Baseline characteristics of individuals with T2DM from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink initiating GLP-1 RAs (n=589*), UK

    Statistics

    Frequency distributions were generated for categorical data while means, SD, medians, and quartiles (25th and 75th percentile) were generated for continuous variables. For weight change, results are reported as the mean amount of weight (kg) lost for the cohort with available data and proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful weight loss (≥5%) at 12 and 24 months.

    Frequencies of adherence and discontinuation by age, gender, and prescription dosing frequency (weekly vs daily), and baseline BMI were generated for each follow-up time point. To investigate patient characteristics associated with GLP-1 RA adherence and discontinuation, bivariate (unadjusted) and multivariable (adjusted) logistic regression models were generated at 12 and 24 months (cumulative). Because baseline BMI was missing for 10.5% of the cohort, the bivariate models for BMI and the multivariable models that include BMI excluded these patients. Survival analysis was used to produce a Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve of time until discontinuation over 2 years of follow-up.

    Results

    A total of 589 patients met the inclusion criteria. Weight measures were available for 57.9% patients at 12 months and 39.4% patients at 24 months; 90% had at least two GLP-1 RA prescriptions to assess adherence.

    Patient baseline characteristics

    Mean age was 53.0 years and 56.4% of the cohort was female (table 1). The mean BMI was 41.7 kg/m2 indicating a highly obese cohort. Prevalence of CVD was 28.4%. Mean baseline HbA1c was 49.4 mmol/mol (SD 36.1) (note: 49 mmol/mol≈6.6%); 78.9% of patients initiated a daily dose of GLP-1 RA while 21.1% initiated a weekly dose of GLP-1 RA.

    Weight change

    Among patients who had weight measured at 12 months, 33.4% of patients lost ≥5% of their baseline weight, 37.5% lost <5% and 29.0% gained weight. Comparatively, at 24 months, 43.5% of patients with weight measures available lost ≥5% of their baseline weight, while 24.1% lost <5% and 32.3% gained weight (table 2). Among patients with weight measures available at 12 and 24 months, the mean/median weight change was −4.6 kg (SD 9.0)/–3.1 kg (IQR −8.0, 1.0) and −5.2 kg (SD 11.7)/–4.2 (IQR −10.0, 3.0), respectively (table 2).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Weight change at 12 and 24 months follow-up among patients with T2DM initiating GLP-1 RA therapy in the CPRD dataset

    Adherence

    Overall, 64.5% of patients were adherent to GLP-1 RA therapy at 12 months; adherence decreased to 59.2% at the cumulative 24-month follow-up (figure 1).

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Per cent of patients who were adherent to (n=530)† and discontinued (n=589) GLP-1 RA therapy at 12 and 24 months. †Adherence assessed among patients with two or more GLP-1 RA prescriptions. BMI, body mass index; GLP-1 RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist.

    The proportions of patients adherent at 12 and 24 months were comparable by gender; 66.3%/59.7% of females and 62.2%/58.7% of males were adherent at 12/24 months. Although a higher proportion of patients <45 years of age were adherent compared with the older age groups at both follow-up time points (figure 1), the bivariate and multivariable model showed that the odds of adherence did not differ among age groups (table 3). The proportions of patients adherent to GLP-1 RAs were comparable across most BMI categories as well, ranging between 60.0% and 68.5% for all BMI categories except BMI <30 kg/m2 (figure 1). Despite there being an association between having a BMI <30 kg/m2 and lower adherence at 12 months (multivariable model OR 0.31 (95%CI 0.11 to 0.87)), no association was found between BMI and adherence at 24 months. More patients on a weekly GLP-1 RA were adherent at 12 (82.1%) and 24 (74.1%) months than those on a daily dose (59.8% at 12 months, 55.3% at 24 months). Patients prescribed weekly doses were more likely to adhere to GLP-1 RA therapy than patients prescribed daily doses at both 12 (multivariable model OR 3.09, (95% CI 1.78 to 5.38) and 24 months (multivariable model OR 2.24 (95% CI 1.37 to 3.67)) (table 3). The mean PDC was 0.835 at 12 months which decreased to 0.807 at 24 months.

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Bivariate and multivariable* logistic regression models for adherence (left) and discontinuation (right) to GLP-1 RA therapy at 12 and 24 months follow-up†

    Discontinuation

    The overall proportion of patients who discontinued GLP-1 RA therapy was 45.2% at 12 months and 64.7% at 24 months (figure 1). At 12/24 months, 42.8%/63.3% and 48.2%/66.5% of females and males discontinued, respectively. At 12 and 24 months, discontinuation rates did not vary greatly between age groups, ranging from 40.9% to 48.4% at 12 months and from 60.6% to 70.7% at 24 months (figure 1). Moreover, the odds of discontinuation did not differ across gender or age groups in either the bivariate or multivariable model at 12 or 24 months (table 3). 54.8% of patients on weekly doses vs 42.6% of patients on daily doses discontinued GLP-1 RA therapy within 12 months; these proportions grew to 76.6% of those on weekly and 61.5% of those on daily doses discontinued at 24 months. The bivariate and multivariable models show that patients prescribed weekly doses were 1.6–2.1 times as likely to discontinue as patients on daily doses at 12 and 24 months, respectively (table 3). Discontinuation rates increased in each BMI group between 12 and 24 months, but outside of an increased odds of discontinuation for patients with a BMI of 30–34 kg/m2 at 12 months (multivariable model OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.05 to 3.19)), no association between BMI group and odds of discontinuation at 12 or 24 months was found.

    A Kaplan-Meier plot (figure 2) shows that patients discontinued GLP-1 RA at a median of 426 days (95% CI 384 to 476 days) after initiating therapy.

    Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Time to discontinuation of GLP-1 RAs, Kaplan-Meier plot, n=589. Patients discontinued a median of 426 days (95% CI 384 to 474) after initiating GLP-1 RA therapy.GLP-1 RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist.

    Discussion

    This study described weight change, adherence, and discontinuation patterns of GLP-1 RAs among patients with T2DM newly initiating injectable GLP-1 RA therapy in the UK; 33.4% and 43.5% of patients with weight assessments at 12 and 24 months of follow-up lost ≥5% of their baseline weight, respectively. While 59.2% of patients who remained on therapy were adherent to GLP-1 RA therapy at 24 months, 64.7% of patients discontinued therapy within that time. Patients with a BMI between 30 and 34 kg/m2 were more likely to discontinue therapy at 12 months (bivariate and multivariable model). However, no associations between adherence or discontinuation and BMI were observed at 24 months.

    Past GLP-1 RA studies investigating individual GLP-1 RA agents reported weight change as mean kilograms lost and not as a proportion of patients who achieved ≥5% weight loss, have a study population with an comparatively lower BMI, and/or do not extend beyond 1 year.16–20 In these studies, mean weight change ranged from −1.0 kg to −3.78 kg over 6–12 months. Mean weight change in this study at 12 months was −4.6 kg. However, 80% of patients in the present study with available data had a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 and 56% had BMI ≥40 kg/m2 (median BMI 41.2 kg/m2) compared with mean BMIs in the low to mid 30s in most past studies. Thus, the populations and their weight changes are difficult to compare. Another retrospective analysis using CPRD is an exception; like the present analysis, patients with T2DM given liraglutide had a higher mean weight than those given sitagliptin (mean (SD) 114.3 kg (22.3) vs 95.4 kg (20.7), respectively); patients on liraglutide lost 3.78 kg compared with patients on sitagliptin who lost 1.12 kg over 6 months.20 An analysis of the effects of exenatide over 82 weeks reported that patients taking exenatide in dual therapy with metformin experienced a mean weight loss of 5.3 kg or 5.2% of baseline body weight.21 Comparatively, the present study found that only 33.4%–43.5% (at 12 and 24 months) of patients lost ≥5% of their baseline weight. This finding suggests that, compared with trials, patients in the real world may not frequently achieve clinically meaningful weight loss. It may also suggest that lifestyle interventions, including diet, physical exercise, and psychological support, remain an important component of a weight management strategy in patients with T2DM as pharmacological therapy alone is unlikely to help the majority of patients achieve clinically meaningful weight loss. Given weight loss is an important criterion for GLP-1 RA therapy persistence per NICE guidelines,5 this has important implications for the use of GLP-1 RAs in the UK.

    Reported adherence to AHAs is generally highly variable. A meta-analysis of oral AHAs reported the pooled mean medication possession ratio (MPR) to be 75.3% over 6–24 months of follow-up.22 Adherence to GLP-1 RAs specifically has also been shown to vary widely across studies.8 Thus, the results of this study are overall consistent with previous reports.8 23 24 The finding that patients on weekly dosing regimens are more adherent than those on daily dosing regimens is also consistent with other studies using administrative and electronic medical records datasets across Europe and the USA.8 24

    However, the discontinuation rates in this study were substantially higher than those reported in clinical trials.25 The SUSTAIN6 (Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-term Outcomes With Semaglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes) trial reported that only 22.6% of patients prematurely discontinued semaglutide during the 24-month trial period.26 Comparatively, this study found that 45.2% and 64.7% of patients discontinued by 12 and 24 months, respectively. A sensitivity analysis expanding the allowable gap between end of days of supply of one prescription to start of a new prescription to 120 days did not substantially alter discontinuation rates (43.1% at 12 months, 63.3% at 24 months); this supports the conclusion that a majority of GLP-1 RA new users truly did discontinue therapy in those time periods. The results for discontinuation by dosing schedule (weekly vs daily) diverge from other real-world studies for reasons that are unclear. While other studies have reported greater discontinuation among patients prescribed daily doses compared with weekly doses,23 25 27 the present study found patients on weekly GLP-1 RAs were significantly more likely to discontinue therapy than those on daily GLP-1 RAs.

    The high rates of discontinuation observed in this study prompt consideration of the real-world impact of GLP-1 RA on outcomes. In the LEADER trial, patients at risk for CVD experienced significantly fewer cardiovascular events and deaths than the placebo group after 36 months.6 The findings of the present study suggest that outside the context of randomized trials, patients prescribed GLP-1 RAs discontinue therapy sooner which may impact GLP-1 RAs effectiveness in the real world. The few studies that have evaluated real-world effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs have yielded inconsistent results.8 20 28–30 Future studies should consider evaluating the impact of adherence and persistence on glycemic control, weight, and other outcomes, in totality and by pharmacological agent or class, to better understand potential gaps in translating randomized trials efficacy into real-world effectiveness.

    This study has several limitations. The sample sizes were relatively small: 589 patients met the inclusion criteria; 530 patients had at least two GLP-1 RA prescriptions to be included in the adherence analysis. The small study population was, in part, due to limiting the study to patients without evidence of AHAs other than metformin in the 90 days prior and 30 days after GLP-1 RA initiation. While this criterion reduced the impact of polypharmacy on assessments of weight, adherence, and discontinuation, it also reduced the applicability of its findings to the broader T2DM population. Additionally, patient weights over the follow-up period were available for a fraction of the full cohort and may be subject to unknown biases. It is also worth noting that the impact of lifestyle modifications on weight results could not be ascertained. Adherence was measured using data from electronic health records for prescriptions and calculating PDC. Determining whether patients actually took the medication or took the medication as prescribed would require intensive monitoring. That said, this study used the PDC method because of its increased sensitivity to capturing uncovered days compared with MPR, another commonly used method for estimating adherence.15 Identification of baseline comorbidities was subject to the presence of Read codes and thus may be under-reported. As with other observational studies, it is possible unaccounted for confounding factors may have influenced the results. It is also worth noting that this study investigated injectable GLP-1 RAs only; its findings may not be applicable to oral GLP-1 RAs. Additionally, the markedly higher rates of obesity in this study’s population may reflect a channeling bias; it is possible that physicians’ prefer to prescribe GLP-1 RAs to their patients with greater obesity given the medication’s demonstrated weight loss benefit in clinical trials.4 14 This may impact the generalizability of this study to a broader T2DM UK population. Finally, this was an observational research study of T2DM in the UK using primary care electronic medical records. Its findings, therefore, may not be applicable to other populations.

    In conclusion, one in three patients with body weight measures available achieved clinically meaningful weight loss at 12 months. Although approximately 60% of the cohort was adherent during their observed time on therapy, nearly half of patients discontinued GLP-1 RA therapy within 12 months and nearly two-thirds discontinued within 24 months. Patients may benefit from additional support to improve more long-term adherence to GLP-1 RAs. Further investigation of the association between adherence and weight change on real-world effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs is warranted.

    Data availability statement

    All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Merck licensed the data used in this study and does not have permission to release the data or share with any third party without explicit contractual consent. The study protocol contains specifications of the database and patient selection. The study protocol is available on request.

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    This study did not require IRB approval as it was a retrospective database study in which subjects were properly de-identified to maintain confidentiality. No human subjects were at risk during this study.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to thank Irene Doherty, PhD, of Complete HEOR Solutions, for her drafting and editorial assistance of the manuscript and statistical analysis guidance.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Sharma M,
      2. Nazareth I,
      3. Petersen I
      . Trends in incidence, prevalence and prescribing in type 2 diabetes mellitus between 2000 and 2013 in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010210. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010210pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26769791
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      1. Lautsch D,
      2. Wang T,
      3. Yang L, et al
      . Prevalence of established cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK. Diabetes Ther 2019;10:2131–7.doi:10.1007/s13300-019-00698-9pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31583647
      OpenUrlPubMed
    3. ↵
      1. Iglay K,
      2. Hannachi H,
      3. Joseph Howie P, et al
      . Prevalence and co-prevalence of comorbidities among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Med Res Opin 2016;32:1243–52.doi:10.1185/03007995.2016.1168291
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    4. ↵
      1. American Diabetes Association
      . 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care 2021;44:S111-S124–24.doi:10.2337/dc21-S009pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33298420
      OpenUrlPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
      . Type 2 diabetes in adults: management, 2015. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28/resources/type-2-diabetes-in-adults-management-pdf-1837338615493 [Accessed 21 Nov 2021].
    6. ↵
      1. Marso SP,
      2. Daniels GH,
      3. Brown-Frandsen K, et al
      . Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2016;375:311–22.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1603827
      OpenUrl
    7. ↵
      1. Nordon C,
      2. Karcher H,
      3. Groenwold RHH, et al
      . The "Efficacy-Effectiveness Gap": Historical Background and Current Conceptualization. Value Health 2016;19:75–81.doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2938pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26797239
      OpenUrlPubMed
    8. ↵
      1. Guerci B,
      2. Charbonnel B,
      3. Gourdy P, et al
      . Efficacy and adherence of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in real-life settings. Diabetes Metab 2019;45:528–35.doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2019.01.006
      OpenUrl
    9. ↵
      1. Trujillo JM,
      2. Nuffer W,
      3. Ellis SL
      . Glp-1 receptor agonists: a review of head-to-head clinical studies. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2015;6:19–28.doi:10.1177/2042018814559725pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678953
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Durden E,
      2. Liang M,
      3. Fowler R, et al
      . The effect of early response to GLP-1 RA therapy on long-term adherence and persistence among type 2 diabetes patients in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2019;25:669–80.doi:10.18553/jmcp.2019.18429pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30896359
      OpenUrlPubMed
    11. ↵
      1. Garber AJ
      . Long-Acting glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: a review of their efficacy and tolerability. Diabetes Care 2011;34 Suppl 2:S279-84. doi:10.2337/dc11-s231pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21525469
      OpenUrlPubMed
    12. ↵
      1. McGovern A,
      2. Tippu Z,
      3. Hinton W, et al
      . Comparison of medication adherence and persistence in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:1040–3.doi:10.1111/dom.13160pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29135080
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Herrett E,
      2. Gallagher AM,
      3. Bhaskaran K, et al
      . Data resource profile: clinical practice research Datalink (CPRD). Int J Epidemiol 2015;44:827–36.doi:10.1093/ije/dyv098
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    14. ↵
      1. Wing RR,
      2. Lang W,
      3. Wadden TA, et al
      . Benefits of modest weight loss in improving cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1481–6.doi:10.2337/dc10-2415pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21593294
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      1. Andrade SE,
      2. Kahler KH,
      3. Frech F, et al
      . Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006;15:565–74.doi:10.1002/pds.1230pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16514590
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      1. Nauck M,
      2. Frid A,
      3. Hermansen K, et al
      . Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:84–90.doi:10.2337/dc08-1355
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    17. ↵
      1. Garber A,
      2. Henry R,
      3. Ratner R, et al
      . Liraglutide versus glimepiride monotherapy for type 2 diabetes (LEAD-3 mono): a randomised, 52-week, phase III, double-blind, parallel-treatment trial. Lancet 2009;373:473–81.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61246-5pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18819705
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. Zinman B,
      2. Gerich J,
      3. Buse JB, et al
      . Efficacy and safety of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide in combination with metformin and thiazolidinedione in patients with type 2 diabetes (LEAD-4 Met+TZD). Diabetes Care 2009;32:1224–30.doi:10.2337/dc08-2124
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Umpierrez G,
      2. Tofé Povedano S,
      3. Pérez Manghi F, et al
      . Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3). Diabetes Care 2014;37:2168–76.doi:10.2337/dc13-2759pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24842985
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    20. ↵
      1. Nyeland ME,
      2. Ploug UJ,
      3. Richards A, et al
      . Evaluation of the effectiveness of liraglutide and sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study in UK primary care. Int J Clin Pract 2015;69:281–91.doi:10.1111/ijcp.12575pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25302822
      OpenUrlPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Blonde L,
      2. Klein EJ,
      3. Han J, et al
      . Interim analysis of the effects of exenatide treatment on A1c, weight and cardiovascular risk factors over 82 weeks in 314 overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2006;8:436–47.doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00602.xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16776751
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      1. Iglay K,
      2. Cartier SE,
      3. Rosen VM, et al
      . Meta-Analysis of studies examining medication adherence, persistence, and discontinuation of oral antihyperglycemic agents in type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2015;31:1283–96.doi:10.1185/03007995.2015.1053048pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26023805
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Wilke T,
      2. Mueller S,
      3. Groth A, et al
      . Non-Persistence and Non-Adherence of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in therapy with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a retrospective analysis. Diabetes Ther 2016;7:105–24.doi:10.1007/s13300-015-0149-4pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26695499
      OpenUrlPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Qiao Q,
      2. Ouwens MJ,
      3. Grandy S, et al
      . Adherence to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy administered by once-daily or once-weekly injection in patients with type 2 diabetes in Germany. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2016;9:201-5.doi:10.2147/DMSO.S99732pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27418849
      OpenUrlPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Federici MO,
      2. McQuillan J,
      3. Biricolti G, et al
      . Utilization patterns of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Italy: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Ther 2018;9:789–801.doi:10.1007/s13300-018-0396-2pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29525885
      OpenUrlPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Marso SP,
      2. Bain SC,
      3. Consoli A, et al
      . Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1834–44.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1607141pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27633186
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Malmenäs M,
      2. Bouchard JR,
      3. Langer J
      . Retrospective real-world adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating once-daily liraglutide 1.8 Mg or twice-daily exenatide 10 μg. Clin Ther 2013;35:795–807.doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.03.021pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23642290
      OpenUrlPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Dhesi B,
      2. Chauhan H,
      3. Basu A
      . Audit of clinical practice in the use of incretin mimetic agents for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes. Practical Diabetes 2013;30:159–62.doi:10.1002/pdi.1767
      OpenUrl
    29. ↵
      1. Coleman CI,
      2. Pandya S,
      3. Wang L, et al
      . Treatment patterns, glycemic control and bodyweight with canagliflozin 300 mg versus GLP1RAs in Type II diabetes patients. J Comp Eff Res 2019;8:889–905.doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0002pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31167554
      OpenUrlPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Thomsen RW,
      2. Baggesen LM,
      3. Søgaard M, et al
      . Early glycaemic control in metformin users receiving their first add-on therapy: a population-based study of 4,734 people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2015;58:2247–53.doi:10.1007/s00125-015-3698-1pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26277380
      OpenUrlPubMed

    Supplementary materials

    • Supplementary Data

      This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Footnotes

    • Contributors TW, LY, SP, SR, and KI contributed to the concept, design, and planning of the study. TW, LY, SP, BS, RB, and KI contributed to the analysis of the data. All coauthors contributed to the interpretation of the study results. TW contributed to drafting the manuscript alongside medical writer, Irene Doherty. The remaining coauthors contributed to critically reviewing and revising the manuscript. TW is guarantor for this work.

    • Funding This study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

    • Competing interests TW, LY, RB, SR, and KI are/were employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA at the time of study conduct. RDC was an employee of MSD UK, London, UK at the time of study conduct and holds an honorary position at University College, London, UK. BS and SP were external contractors of Complete HEOR Solutions whose analysis services were paid for by Merck & Co., Inc.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.