Discussion
The overall prevalence of dysglycemia in this study was 23.6% and undiagnosed DM was present in 6.5% of the study population. The prevalence estimates of DM, IFG, and IGT in this study were made according to current WHO criteria, based on OGTT. The 6.5% prevalence of undiagnosed type 2 DM found in this study (7.9% in men and 4.7% in women) is analogous to the prevalence rates reported in Ghana2 and Croatia17 (6.3% and 6.1%, respectively). However, it is much higher than the existing Nigerian national prevalence of 2.2%18 and several other studies from Nigeria.19–21 The prevalence of type 2 DM in a survey of the Lagos metropolis by Ohwovoriole et al22 was 1.5% in men and 1.9% in women. Leslie et al23 demonstrated prevalence rates of 4.6% in men and 2.3% in women in Pima Indians and Sabir19 in North West Nigeria, and a study by Puepet24 in urban Jos (Nigeria) obtained prevalence rates of 3.1%. However, recent data from North West Nigeria19 and North East Nigeria20 suggest higher prevalence rates of 4.6% and 7%, respectively. The highest prevalence rates in an urban community were found in Port Harcourt (7.9%)21 and Lagos Mainland, Nigeria (7.2%).18
The increased prevalence demonstrated in our study population, compared with many other Nigerian studies, may be attributable to modernization and the adoption of a western lifestyle, as observed in other studies.25 The increased prevalence compared with that in North West Nigeria may also be due to reasons of ethnicity. A study by Nyenwe et al21 in Port Harcourt reported a higher prevalence of diabetes among the Ibibio who are of South East extraction like the Efiks, Quas, Ekois, and Ejaghams in Calabar. The prevalence of undiagnosed type 2 DM is, however, lower than that reported in Port Harcourt by Nyenwe et al.21 Though Calabar and Port Harcourt are within the Niger Delta region of Nigeria, Port Harcourt is more industrialized with a heavy presence of oil and gas workers compared with the predominantly civil servant population in Calabar. Civil servants are not as affluent as oil and gas workers and are less likely to afford meals with a high content of refined carbohydrate and fat.
In the present study, the highest prevalence of DM was in the middle age category (40–59 years), which is comparable with reports from other studies carried out in low-income and middle-income countries.12 The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) reports that the 40–59 age category currently has the greatest number of people living with diabetes, with some 132 million individuals in 2010, more than 75% of whom live in low-income and middle-income countries.11 In contrast, the majority of people with diabetes in high-income countries are >64 years of age.11
The prevalence of IFG in this study was 8.8%, which is lower than the overall prevalence of 11.3% (with a male preponderance) found in Croatia. It is also three times lower than the 25.3% prevalence reported by Thorpe et al26 in New York and significantly lower than the 20.4% prevalence found in the Seychelles.27 Much lower figures of IFG have been reported in African settings such as North East Nigeria (14.5%)20 and Ghana (6.1%),2 which are in accordance with our results.2 The IGT prevalence of 19.6% found in this study is higher than that found in many other studies. Prevalence rates of 12.2%, 10.6%, and 10.2% were reported in North West Nigeria,19Ghana,2 and the Seychelles, respectively.27 Williams et al28 found a 16.7% prevalence of IGT in the UK while Omar et al29 reported a much lower prevalence in South Africa of 7.6%. In keeping with our findings for IFG, IGT was most common in the middle age group, with a prevalence of 22.6%.
The overall prevalence of I-IFG was 19% (17.2% in men and 21.5% in women). These values are unlike those found in studies in Mauritius30 and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)8 but are akin to values from another study in Australia.31 These differences may be due to divergent sociodemographic attributes among these populations.
The overall prevalence of I-IGT was 8.5% (9.8% in men and 6.7% in women) in the present study. These results are inconsistent with some studies15 ,23 but parallel to findings from an Australian study.31 I-IFG in the present study was more common than I-IGT. I-IGT identifies those with a higher risk for diabetes.32 Although I-IFG and I-IGT are insulin-resistant states, they differ in their site of insulin resistance.33 ,34 In persons with I-IFG, the predominant abnormality is hepatic insulin resistance as the muscle insulin sensitivity is normal. On the other hand, persons with I-IGT have normal to slightly reduced hepatic insulin sensitivity and moderate-to-severe muscle insulin resistance, while individuals with IFG and IGT have been found to have muscle and hepatic insulin resistance.35
It has been suggested in some studies that the prevalence of I-IGT is higher in women than in men due to the smaller build of women and therefore proportionally larger effect of the same glucose load. However, in this study, I-IGT was higher in men. This may be due to the prevalence of other determinants of I-IGT among men, but this was not explored in this study.
The risks of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease are not homogeneous within the categories of IFG or IGT, but are heavily influenced by the presence or absence of other risk factors.36 For example, individuals with IFG and IGT are at a much higher risk of developing diabetes than individuals with either condition alone.36 The overall prevalence of combined IFG/IGT was 4.5% (4.2% in men and 4.9% in women). Individuals with combined IGT and IFG tend to be at a much higher risk of diabetes than individuals with IGT alone, but those with IGT alone account for a greater proportion of those who eventually develop diabetes.36
The rates of IFG and IGT found in our study are of major significance as they represent intermediate states of abnormal glucose regulation that exist between normal glucose homeostasis and diabetes. These findings underscore the need for tested preventive strategies such as lifestyle modification or pharmacological therapy in preventing or delaying the onset of diabetes in our communities.
In conclusion, there is an alarmingly high prevalence of dysglycemia in Calabar, which portrays a more serious situation than the existing national prevalence figures for DM (2.2%) suggest. This pioneer study has highlighted a serious public health problem in a setting where survey data on non-communicable diseases are grossly lacking. It makes a strong case for revision of existing health policies to reflect this epidemiological transition. Thus, intensified programmes of mass education and case identification and management of DM are imperative to stem this tide of disability and death in our society.
Limitations
This study focused on people between the ages of 15 and 79 years and may have missed out on dysglycemia presenting outside of this age range.