Article Text

The reliability of in-hospital diagnoses of diabetes mellitus in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction
  1. Suzanne V Arnold1,
  2. Kasia J Lipska2,
  3. Silvio E Inzucchi2,
  4. Yan Li3,
  5. Philip G Jones3,
  6. Darren K McGuire4,
  7. Abhinav Goyal5,
  8. Joshua M Stolker6,
  9. Marcus Lind7,
  10. John A Spertus1,
  11. Mikhail Kosiborod1
  1. 1Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
  2. 2Department of Endocrinology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
  3. 3Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
  4. 4University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  5. 5Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  6. 6Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  7. 7University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  1. Correspondence to Suzanne V Arnold; sva1024{at}yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective Incident diabetes mellitus (DM) is important to recognize in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). To develop an efficient screening strategy, we explored the use of random plasma glucose (RPG) at admission and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to select patients with AMI for glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) testing.

Design, setting, andparticipants Prospective registry of 1574 patients with AMI not taking glucose-lowering medication from 24 US hospitals. All patients had HbA1c measured at a core laboratory and admission RPG and ≥2 FPGs recorded during hospitalization. We examined potential combinations of RPG and FPG and compared these with HbA1c≥6.5%—considered the gold standard for DM diagnosis in these analyses.

Results An RPG>140 mg/dL or FPG≥126 mg/dL had high sensitivity for DM diagnosis. Combining these into a screening protocol (if admission RPG>140, check HbA1c; or if FPG≥126 on a subsequent day, check HbA1c) led to HbA1c testing in 50% of patients and identified 86% with incident DM (number needed to screen (NNS)=3.3 to identify 1 case of DM; vs NNS=5.6 with universal HbA1c screening). Alternatively, using an RPG>180 led to HbA1c testing in 40% of patients with AMI and identified 82% of DM (NNS=2.7).

Conclusions We have established two potential selective screening methods for DM in the setting of AMI that could identify the vast majority of incident DM by targeted screening of 40–50% of patients with AMI with HbA1c testing. Using these methods may efficiently identify patients with AMI with DM so that appropriate education and treatment can be promptly initiated.

  • Diagnosis
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Glucose

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement: