Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Discovering successful strategies for diabetic self-management: a qualitative comparative study
  1. Susan C Weller1,2,
  2. Roberta Baer3,
  3. Anita Nash4,
  4. Noe Perez4
  1. 1 Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
  2. 2 Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
  3. 3 Department of Anthropology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
  4. 4 Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Susan C Weller; sweller{at}utmb.edu

Abstract

Objective This project explored lifestyles of patients in good and poor control to identify naturally occurring practices and strategies that result in successful diabetes management.

Research design and methods Semistructured interviews with adult patients with type 2 diabetes explored diet, food preparation, physical activity, medication use and glucose monitoring. Patients (n=56) were classified into good (A1C <7.0%), fair (7.0%<A1C<8.0%) or poor (A1C >8.0%) control groups and matched across groups on diabetes duration (±5 years) and medication modality (none, oral, insulin±oral) to control for non-lifestyle factors. A qualitative comparative analysis identified practices that distinguished glycemic groups.

Results Good control patients were more likely to test their glucose two or more times a day and reduce their sodium intake, as well as increase fruits and vegetables and limit portion sizes, some attaining good control without exercise. Fair control patients discussed several dietary strategies including limiting sweets, drinking non-caloric beverages, reducing carbs, ‘cheating’ (eating only a few sweets/limiting carbs in one meal to have more in another meal) and tested their glucose once a day. Poor control patients were more likely to skip antidiabetic medications and not test their glucose.

Conclusions Although clinical trials indicate most self-management practices have limited effectiveness over time, increased glucose monitoring is a valuable component in daily management. Research is needed on effectiveness of dietary strategies that emphasize sodium monitoring and allow some degree of cheating. Reoffering diabetes education classes and providing pill boxes as memory aids may help improve poor control.

  • Type 2 Diabetes
  • self-management
  • glycemic control

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Acknowledgements Special thanks to Darlene Cass, RN, a diabetes educator who shared her insights with the authors.

  • Contributors SCW designed the study, participated in interviewing, coding, analysis and writing the manuscript; and is the guarantor. RB assisted in designing the study, interpreting data and writing the manuscript. AN participated in interviewing, coding, interpreting data and preparing the manuscript. NP participated in interviewing, coding, interpreting data and preparing the manuscript.

  • Funding This study was funded by the US National ScienceFoundation (BCS-0108232, BCS –0108228) and by the University of Texas MedicalBranch Department of Family Medicine.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent All participating patients signed a consent form approved by the University Institutional Review Board. No personally identifiable information or photos included in the manuscript.

  • Ethics approval University of Texas Medical Branch Institutional Review Board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Original dichotomous coded data are available from the authors (SCW) upon request.