Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Factors influencing variation in participation in the National Diabetes Audit and the impact on the Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators of diabetes care management
  1. Caroline E Wright1,
  2. Stephen Yeung1,
  3. Helen Knowles1,
  4. Antoinette Woodhouse1,
  5. Emma Barron2,
  6. Sian Evans1
  1. 1 Local Knowledge and Intelligence Service (East), Public Health England Midlands and East Region, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2 National Cardiovascular Intelligence Network, Public Health England Yorkshire and the Humber, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Caroline E Wright; caroline.wright{at}phe.gov.uk

Footnotes

  • Contributors HK conceived the study and this was developed further by CEW. Statistical design was led by CEW and SY, who extracted and analyzed the data with AW. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results. CEW led the writing of the manuscript, to which all authors reviewed and contributed. CEW is the guarantor for this work. All authors had full access to all of the data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement All data sets used aggregated, anonymized data and did not require patient consent. The study used routinely collected data that are openly available in the public domain. The statistical code and analysis is available on request from the corresponding author (caroline.wright@phe.gov.uk).

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors HK conceived the study and this was developed further by CEW. Statistical design was led by CEW and SY, who extracted and analyzed the data with AW. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results. CEW led the writing of the manuscript, to which all authors reviewed and contributed. CEW is the guarantor for this work. All authors had full access to all of the data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement All data sets used aggregated, anonymized data and did not require patient consent. The study used routinely collected data that are openly available in the public domain. The statistical code and analysis is available on request from the corresponding author (caroline.wright@phe.gov.uk).

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.