Article Text

Download PDFPDF

FOXN3 hyperglycemic risk allele and insulin sensitivity in humans
  1. Melissa L Erickson1,
  2. Santhosh Karanth2,
  3. Eric Ravussin1,
  4. Amnon Schlegel2
  1. 1Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
  2. 2University of Utah Molecular Medicine Program and the Departments of Internal Medicine, Biochemistry, and Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Amnon Schlegel; amnons{at}u2m2.utah.edu

Abstract

Objective The rs8004664 variation within the FOXN3 gene is significantly and independently associated with fasting blood glucose in humans. We have previously shown that the hyperglycemia risk allele (A) increases FOXN3 expression in primary human hepatocytes; over-expression of human FOXN3 in zebrafish liver increases fasting blood glucose; and heterozygous deletion of the zebrafish ortholog foxn3 decreases fasting blood glucose. Paralleling these model organism findings, we found that rs8004664 A|A homozygotes had blunted glucagon suppression during an oral glucose tolerance test. Here, we test associations between insulin sensitivity and the rs8004664 variation.

Research design and methods 92 participants (49±13 years, body mass index: 32±6 kg/m2, 28 with and 64 without type 2 diabetes mellitus) were genotyped at rs8004664. Insulin sensitivity was measured by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp technique.

Results The “A” allele frequency was 59%; the protective (G) allele frequency was 41% (A|A: n=29; G|G: n=12; A|G: n=50). Clamp-measured glucose disposal rate (GDR) was not different by genotype (F=0.046, p=0.96) or by “A” allele carrier (p=0.36). Female G|G homozygotes had better insulin sensitivity compared to female “A” allele carriers (GDR; G|G: 9.9±3.0 vs A|A+A|G: 7.1±3.0 mg/kg fat-free mass+17.7/min; p=0.04). Insulin sensitivity was not different by genotype or by “A” allele carriers.

Conclusion The rs8004664 variation within the FOXN3 gene may modulate insulin sensitivity in women.

  • diabetes
  • GWAS
  • FOXN3
  • human
  • euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp
  • liver

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors MLE analyzed and interpreted data, and drafted manuscript. SK conceptualized study, collected and interpreted data, and edited the manuscript. ER conceptualized study, collected and interpreted data, and edited the manuscript. AS conceptualized study, collected and interpreted data, and edited the manuscript. ER is the guarantor of the study, having full access to all study data; he had the final responsibility for data integrity, accuracy of data analysis, and decision to submit for publication. All authors have approved the final version of this manuscript.

  • Funding This study was funded in part from the National Institutes of Health (grants P30DK072476; ER), and funds from the University of Utah Molecular Medicine Program and University of Utah School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (AS).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval The study was performed in accordance with the principles contained within the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center. All participants provided informed, written consent prior to study participation.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request.