Objective Our objective is to identify the potential factors associated with serum Diacron’s reactive oxygen metabolites test (D-ROM) levels of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by conducting cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses in two large cohorts and further strengthening these results by performing a meta-analysis.
Methods Serum D-ROM concentrations were measured in 1045 and 1101 patients with T2DM from two independent cohort studies from Germany at baseline and repeatedly 3–4 years later. The cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of various potential determinants with D-ROM levels were assessed with a backwards selection algorithm in multivariable adjusted models.
Results In the meta-analysis of the cross-sectional analysis, female sex, low education, obesity, smoking, high total cholesterol, hemoglobin A1c ≥7%, no diabetes medication, a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, a history of cancer and C reactive protein levels (CRP) >3 mg/L were statistically significantly associated with increased D-ROM levels in patients with T2DM. The meta-analysis of the longitudinal analysis revealed that old age, female sex, obesity, smoking, physical inactivity, high alcohol consumption, ≥5 years since diabetes diagnosis and CRP levels between 3 mg/L and 10 mg/L were statistically significantly associated with D-ROM levels measured 3–4 years later.
Conclusions (validity, limitations and clinical applicability) This comprehensive analysis confirmed that several modifiable risk factors are being associated with oxidative stress in patients with T2DM within an observational study design. We discuss potential prevention measures against these risk factors that might help to reduce oxidative stress and to prevent some cases of premature mortality in patients with T2DM.
- oxidative Stress
- reactive oxygen species
- lipid peroxidation
- type 2 diabetes mellitus
- risk factors
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- oxidative Stress
- reactive oxygen species
- lipid peroxidation
- type 2 diabetes mellitus
- risk factors
Significance of this study
What is already known about this subject?
Oxidative stress is a driving force in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The Diacron’s reactive oxygen metabolites test (D-ROM) serum concentration has recently been shown to be strongly associated with mortality in patients with T2DM.
What are the new findings?
To the best of our knowledge, no study has comprehensively investigated the potential risk factors for high oxidative stress among patients with T2DM so far.
We investigated associations of 22 potential determinants with high oxidative stress among patients with T2DM of two large cohort studies both in cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis and conducted meta-analyses.
The meta-analysis of the longitudinal analysis revealed that old age, female sex, obesity, smoking, physical inactivity, high alcohol consumption, ≥5 years since diabetes diagnosis and C reactive protein levels between 3 mg/L and 10 mg/L were statistically significantly associated with D-ROM levels measured 3–4 years later.
How might these results change the focus of research or clinical practice?
This comprehensive analysis confirmed that several modifiable risk factors are being associated with oxidative stress in patients with T2DM. We discuss potential prevention measures against these risk factors that might help to reduce oxidative stress and to prevent some cases of premature mortality in patients with T2DM.
Oxidative stress (OS) can be termed as any imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant defenses resulting in tissue damage.1 High levels of OS are already known to be a partaker in progressing cell senescence and resulting in aging-related diseases,2 like type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM),3 4 cancer and various diseases of cardiovascular, neurological and cognitive origin.5 OS can contribute to the course of T2DM by increasing insulin resistance via disruption of the insulin signaling pathway and by contributing to an impairment of pancreatic beta cell function6 7 Thus, OS is believed to play a role in the development of diabetes complications.8–10
Recently, our group showed that the OS biomarker Diacron’s reactive oxygen metabolites test (D-ROM) was strongly associated with the mortality of patients with T2DM.10 This test measures OS by detecting molecules with hydroperoxide groups (chemical: R-O-O-H) in serum or plasma.11 D-ROM is mainly a biomarker of lipid peroxidation and has been demonstrated to be very stable in blood samples stored for many years.12
To the best of our knowledge, no single study has comprehensively investigated major potential determinants of OS in patients with T2DM so far. We, therefore, conducted cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses in two large cohorts of patients with T2DM to identify the factors associated with serum D-ROM levels. Results were pooled in individual patient data meta-analyses to increase the statistical power and to minimize the risk of detection of statistically significant associations by chance in single studies.
The current study is an individual patient data meta-analysis of two prospective, German cohort studies, namely the ESTHER study (German name: ‘Epidemiologische Studie zu Chancen der Verhütung, Früherkennung und optimierten Therapie chronischer Erkrankungen in der älteren Bevölkerung’)13 and the DIANA study (German name: Diabetes mellitus: Neue Wege der Optimierung der allgemeinen ärztlichen Betreuung).14
The ESTHER study is an ongoing, population-based cohort study from the South-Western German federal state Saarland and is being conducted among older adults aged between 50 years and 75 years.13 The baseline examination was implemented in 2000–2002 when the 9949 participants were enrolled by their respective general practitioners (GPs) during a routine health examination. Follow-up (FU) examinations were carried out 2, 5, 8, 11 and 14 years after baseline via self-administered questionnaires filled out by the participants and their respective GPs. Additionally, blood samples were collected at the 5-year, 8-year, 11-year and 14-year FU, and home visits were conducted at the 8-year, 11-year and 14-year FU. The home visits were conducted by trained study physicians, lasted approximately 3 hours, and were used to collect further detailed information via pharmacological, geriatric, cognitive and anthropometric examinations.15
The DIANA study included 1158 patients diagnosed with T2DM who were 18 years or older at baseline (93.7% were older than 40 years). Study participants were recruited by their GP in accordance with a standardized protocol between October 2008 and March 2010 in the Ludwigsburg-Heilbronn area situated in South-West Germany.14 Study participants were re-examined 4 and 7 years after baseline. In addition to the sociodemographic characteristics reported by patients, the GPs also filled questionnaires with questions about diabetes treatment and comorbidities. In addition, blood samples were collected at baseline, 4-year and 7-year FU.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The schematic presentation of the study populations used in the cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis is shown in figure 1. For the ESTHER study, 8-year FU data served as the baseline and 11-year FU data were considered as the FU measurement for this research project. From 9949 total ESTHER participants, 6020 participated again in the 8-year FU. Subsequently, 4633 study participants (76.9%) were excluded as they did not have a physician-reported diabetes diagnosis or self-reported use of antidiabetic medication. Additionally, 25 potentially type 1 diabetes cases (diabetes diagnosis was before the age of 40 years) were excluded, resulting in a T2DM patient population of n=1362. Furthermore, 317 subjects without D-ROM data (in most cases because of a missing blood sample) were excluded, resulting in a sample size of 1045 for the cross-sectional analyses. Additionally, 314 subjects were excluded for longitudinal study as they lacked 11-year D-ROM measurements because of missing repeated blood samples. Thus, 731 participants were finally included for the longitudinal analyses.
For the DIANA study, baseline measurements served as the basis for the cross-sectional study, and the 4-year FU data were considered as the FU measurements for the longitudinal analysis. Out of the 1158 baseline participants, 19 participants aged 40 years and younger (potential type 1 diabetes) were not considered and 38 were excluded due to lack of baseline D-ROM measurements, resulting in n=1101 patients with T2DM to be included in the cross-sectional analyses. For the longitudinal analysis, 361 subjects were excluded as they lacked 4-year FU D-ROM measurements due to missing repeated blood samples, leaving 740 study participants. Among the included sample from the DIANA cohort, no study participant reported a diabetes diagnosis before the age of 40 years, and we assumed that all included study participants are patients with T2DM.
Serum samples from both studies were shipped to the Laboratory for Health Protection Research (Bilthoven, the Netherlands), in which the assay used to measure D-ROM (Diacron, Grosseto, Italy) was adapted to an autoanalyzer (LX20-Pro, Beckman-Coulter, Woerden, the Netherlands).16 The assay measures Caratelli units (Carr U) and 1 Carr U corresponds to 0.08 mg H2O2/dL in serum. Based on the distribution of D-ROM levels in 5000 healthy Italians, Diacron suggested to define ‘high OS’ by D-ROM levels >400 Carr U. We use this definition of ‘high OS’ in this research project because D-ROM levels above this cut-off were shown to be associated with mortality in a large meta-analysis of cohort studies with older adults from the general population.17
Assessment of potential determinants of OS
As we aim to present a broad overview of potential risk factors for high OS among patients with T2DM, all assessed variables in the two studies, which are directly or indirectly related to the lifestyle or health status, were selected as potential determinants. The chosen sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were age, sex, education, smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, vegetable consumption, fruit consumption and body mass index (BMI), and they were all retrieved from the study participants’ standardized questionnaires.
The question about physical activity was in the ESTHER study was: ‘How many hours per week are you on average been physically active (at work and during leisure time combined) at present?’. The information about vigorous physical activity (eg, sport) has been used to code the following dichotomous variable: inactive: 0 hour of vigorous physical activity/week; active: >0 hour of vigorous physical activity/week. The question on vigorous physical activity in the DIANA study was: ‘On how many of the last 7 days did you do vigorous physical activity?’. If the answer was ‘Not at all in last 7 days’, participants were grouped into the ‘inactive’ category. The question on alcohol consumption in both studies was similar: ‘How much alcohol did you drink on average per week … (ESTHER: ‘… at present’; DIANA: ‘… in last 12 months’)?’. The information on the numbers of bottles of beer, glasses of wine, and shots of spirits have been used to calculate the consumption of grams of ethanol per day. Subsequently, WHO categories of low, moderate and high alcohol consumption have been coded (see legend of table 1 for details). Dietary information was assessed in both studies with one question: ‘How often did you consume the following food and drinks in the last 12 months on average?’. In this analysis, we combined study participants, who answered ‘several times per day’ or ‘once per day’ in the category ‘daily consumers’, and all other answer categories (which differed in the two studies but all described frequencies less often than daily consumption) were combined in the category ‘non-daily consumers’.
Selected medical diagnoses and major past disease events were coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure, hypertension, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and cancer. Information on the medical history was taken from the physicians’ questionnaires. The only exception was cancer in the ESTHER study, which was recorded by the cancer registry of Saarland.
Furthermore, we selected important T2DM-related variables. Data on diabetes medication were obtained from the reported medication of both the participants’ and the physicians’ questionnaires. The year of diabetes diagnosis was recorded from the participant’s questionnaire, and the time since diabetes diagnosis was calculated. In both studies, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured from full blood with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods certified by the National Glycohemoglobin Standardisation Program. In the ESTHER study, the Bio-Rad Variant II (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA) and in the DIANA study, the G8 HPLC Analyzer (Tosoh Biosciences, Griesheim (Darmstadt), Germany) were used.
Further serum biomarkers were selected as potential determinants of D-ROM levels, and all analytes were purchased from Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany. Total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol were assessed by enzymatic colorimetric tests (analytes ESTHER: Chol2 2100 and HDLC3 450; analytes DIANA: CHOL and HDL-C plus third generation). C reactive protein (CRP) was determined by immunoturbidimetry on a Cobas 8000 C701 (analyte in both studies: CRPL3). Serum creatinine was measured by the kinetic Jaffé method on a Cobas 8000 C701 (analyte ESTHER: CREJ2 3000; analyte DIANA: CREA plus). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated with the creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation, and an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² was considered to indicate renal dysfunction.18
All statistical analyses were carried out with SAS (Statistical Analysis System) V.9.4, and all tests were performed two sided using an α-level of 0.05 unless stated otherwise. The proportion of missing values was below 2% for all variables except time since diabetes diagnosis, which had 18% of missing values in the ESTHER cohort. Multiple imputation of five data sets was undertaken to deal with missing values assumed to be missing at random, and the results of these five imputed datasets were combined by the SAS procedure PROC MIANALYZE. All analyses were first carried out separately in both cohorts and pooled by random effects meta-analyses thereafter. Meta-analyses were conducted with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 2.0 software (Biostat, Englewood, New Jersey, USA).
Generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to assess the association of categorized or binary modeled factors with continuously modeled D-ROM at designated baselines of the two studies. Backwards selection was used in both studies to remove non-significant variables with an α-level ≥0.1. To derive the final model, previously excluded variables were added again if they were associated with D-ROM levels with an α-level <0.1 in one but not in the other study because they could be statistically significant (p<0.05) in the meta-analysis. Meta-analyses with random effects were chosen to acknowledge between-study heterogeneity. In addition, the finally selected variables from the GLM analysis were also used for a logistic regression analysis to obtain ORs with 95% CIs for a dichotomous outcome of high OS defined by D-ROM levels >400 Carr U (reference group: D-ROM levels ≤400). The obtained ORs from the two cohorts were also pooled by random effects meta-analysis. CRP was not included in the main analysis due to its high correlation with D-ROM levels. Instead, we conducted a sensitivity analysis in which the final model was adjusted for CRP.
The statistical methods for the longitudinal analysis were analogous to those of the cross-sectional analysis. The only differences were the following:
The dependent variable in the GLM analysis was the change (Δ) in D-ROM concentrations observed from the chosen baseline to the FU 3 years (ESTHER study) or 4 years (DIANA study) after baseline.
The dependent variable in the logistic regression analysis was D-ROM levels in the FU >400 Carr U (reference group: D-ROM levels ≤400). All participants with baseline D-ROM concentrations >400 Carr U were filtered out from this analysis in order to analyze only incident cases of high OS.
All models were adjusted for baseline D-ROM concentrations.
Baseline characteristics of the included patients with T2DM of the ESTHER diabetes subcohort and the DIANA study are shown in table 1. With few exceptions, most of the baseline characteristics’ distributions were comparable. While the DIANA study sample included more study participants younger than 60 years, the proportion of individuals aged 60–70 years was higher in the ESTHER study. Presumably due to the age difference, on average, the DIANA study participants were more frequently physically active and had more frequently HDL levels <40 mg/L. In the ESTHER sample, more patients with T2DM were rather recently diagnosed with diabetes in the last 5 years, had more frequently an HbA1c <7% and were more frequently non-pharmacologically treated. These differences can be explained by the fact that the ESTHER study population was recruited during a health check-up that screened for undiagnosed diabetes, and therefore the ESTHER study includes more patients with early-stage T2DM. In line with this, the proportion of T2DM patients with high OS, defined by D-ROM levels >400 Carr units, was lower in the ESTHER study (23.0%) than in the DIANA study (38.5%).
In the following text, the results of the cross-sectional analyses with a continuous and dichotomous dependent D-ROM variable (table 2) as well as the longitudinal analyses with a continuous and dichotomous dependent D-ROM variable (table 3) are being summarized by potential risk factors, starting with age. The tables only show the results for potential risk factors, which were associated with D-ROM levels with an α-level <0.1 in at least one of the two studies. All other factors listed in table 1 but not in table 2 or table 3 were removed from the multivariable model because they were not associated with D-ROM levels (α-level ≥0.1 in both studies). In the text, we focus on the results from the meta-analysis of two cohort studies. Results from the two individual cohorts are shown in online supplementary tables 1–4.
In the cross-sectional analysis, age was not associated with D-ROM levels. However, in the longitudinal analysis, the risk of higher OS increased with increasing age. The odds of having high OS was 50% and 74% higher in the age groups 70–<80 years and ≥80 years, respectively, compared with the age group younger than 60 years (table 3).
Female sex was one of the factors most strongly associated with OS in both the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. The odds of having high OS were more than fourfold and twofold increased for women compared with men in cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis, respectively (tables 2–3).
Twelve or more years of school education were statistically significantly associated with lower odds of high OS in the cross-sectional logistic regression model. Individuals with ≥12 years of school education had 43% lower odds of having high OS compared with those with ≤9 years of education (table 2). However, the results did not resonate in the longitudinal models.
Body mass index
T2DM patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m² had significantly higher odds of high OS in all cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. The logistic model results even showed statistically significant ORs in all obesity groups from 30 kg/m² and above. In cross-sectional analysis, compared with participants with <25 kg/m², the OR point estimates for high OS were 1.35, 1.64 and 2.83 for the BMI groups 30–<35, 35–<40 and ≥40 kg/m², respectively (table 2). These corresponding ORs from the longitudinal analysis were comparable: 1.50, 1.74 and 2.12 (table 3).
Current heavy smokers (>15 g tobacco/day) had higher odds of having high D-ROM levels as compared with non-smokers in all cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. More than twofold and up to 1.5-fold increased odds of OS was detected for current smokers in the cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis, respectively (tables 2–3). Weaker but also statistically significant 1.2-fold and 1.3-fold increased odds for high OS were also observed for former smokers in the cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis, respectively (tables 2–3).
Alcohol consumption was only statistically significantly associated with D-ROM levels >400 Carr U in the longitudinal analysis. Interestingly, whereas moderate alcohol consumers had a 56% lower odds of high D-ROM compared with abstainers, T2DM patients with high alcohol consumption had more than twofold odds of high OS (table 3).
Like alcohol consumption, physical activity was also only associated with OS in the prospective analysis. As expected, people engaging in physical activity had significantly lower odds of OS. The effect estimate was statistically significant in the GLM model and close to statistical significance in the logistic regression model (table 3).
Vegetable and fruits consumption
Neither vegetable nor fruits consumption habits were associated with D-ROM levels in any of the multivariable models.
An HbA1c ≥7% was statistically significantly associated with slightly increased odds of OS in the cross-sectional analysis (OR point estimates were 1.32 and 1.38 for the HbA1c groups ‘7%–<8%’ and ‘≥8 %’, respectively; table 2). In contrast, baseline HbA1c was not associated with FU D-ROM levels.
Compared with those patients with T2DM not treated with antidiabetic drugs, both users of oral antidiabetics and insulin had statistically significantly lower D-ROM levels (table 2). However, the picture was completely different in the longitudinal analysis. Oral antidiabetics use was not associated with future D-ROM levels, and insulin use was associated with higher odds of OS at FU (statistically significant in GLM model and close to statistical significance in the logistic regression model (table 3).
Time since diabetes diagnosis
Results for the time since diabetes diagnosis, which is an imprecise proxy for the state of the progression of the disease, were not statistically significant in the cross-sectional analysis. However, patients with T2DM, who were recently diagnosed (ie, in the last 5 years). had slightly lower odds of high OS in the future than patients with T2DM who have already lived with the disease for a longer time (table 3).
None of the assessed diseases or past disease events were associated with OS in the longitudinal analyses. Moreover, renal dysfunction, hypertension and CHD were not statistically significantly associated with OS in the cross-sectional analyses. In contrast, patients with heart failure, a previous MI or a history of cancer had statistically significantly 1.3-fold, 1.4-fold and 1.5-fold increased odds of high OS, respectively (table 2). In addition, a history of stroke was statistically significantly associated with lower OS in the GLM model and on the border to statistical significance in the logistic regression model (table 2).
Total and HDL cholesterol
In the cross-sectional analysis, T2DM patients with increased total cholesterol levels ≥200 mg/dL had higher odds of increased D-ROM levels (table 2). However, total cholesterol was not significantly associated with OS in the prospective analysis. HDL cholesterol was neither associated with OS in the cross-sectional nor longitudinal analysis.
C reactive protein
CRP was added to the final models in a sensitivity analysis. The known high correlation with D-ROM levels manifested in very high ß-coefficients for the associations of increased CRP levels with D-ROM concentrations (online supplementary tables 5–6). However, ß-coefficients were strongly attenuated in the longitudinal analysis and only subclinical inflammation (CRP >3–≤10 mg/dL) remained statistically significantly associated with D-ROM levels. Effect estimates for the other covariates of the model were mostly similar or slightly attenuated in the CRP adjusted models. The only noteworthy changes were observed for the association of high BMI and high HbA1c with D-ROM levels, which were strongly attenuated and lost statistical significance.
In the current meta-analysis of two distinct T2DM cohorts from Germany, female sex, low education, obesity, smoking, high total cholesterol, HbA1c ≥7%, no diabetes medication, a history of MI, heart failure, a history of cancer and CRP >3 mg/L were statistically significantly associated with higher D-ROM levels cross-sectionally. The longitudinal meta-analysis revealed that old age, female sex, obesity, smoking, high alcohol consumption, ≥5 years since diabetes diagnosis and subclinical inflammation (CRP 3–≤10 mg/L) were associated with increased D-ROM levels. In the following discussion, we put these findings into context with results from other studies and discuss potential mechanisms and prevention measures.
Higher age was associated with elevated OS in the longitudinal but not in the cross-sectional analysis of our study. A recent cross-sectional study with 126 T2DM and hypertensive adults assessed the associations of age with different OS markers, namely 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) and malondialdehyde (MDA).19 MDA is a lipid peroxidation biomarker like D-ROM and was also not associated with age, which is in agreement with our cross-sectional findings. However, 8-OH-dG, which is a biomarker for DNA oxidation, was associated with age. No comparable longitudinal study has been published so far. In summary, the cross-sectional relationship of age and OS may depend on the OS biomarker chosen. However, there is consensus in the scientific literature that age is associated with increased OS levels,20 21 a hypothesis, which was once more supported by our longitudinal analysis. As OS is known to be a driving force in T2DM and related complications,22 preventive efforts against high OS should have a specific focus on older patients with T2DM.
Female sex was particularly strongly associated with high OS in our cohorts, suggesting that older women with T2DM are being more vulnerable toward the hazards of OS than men. The impact of female sex on OS biomarker levels depends on the estrogen blood concentrations and thus on menopausal status.23 While a small study in healthy adults aged 20–39 years reported that premenopausal women have lower OS levels than men,24 a different study in adults aged 50–75 years found perimenopausal and postmenopausal women prone to higher OS than men.25 Most of the participants of the ESTHER and DIANA study included in our study were 50 years and older indicating the inclusion of mostly perimenopausal and postmenopausal women26 in our study. This explains the observed association of female sex with high OS in our study. Likewise, a cross-sectional study from Japan with 100 on average 59-year-old patients with type 2 diabetes observed significantly higher D-ROM levels in women than men.27 A hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may be considered after a thorough risk-benefit evaluation for each individual perimenopausal or postmenopausal woman with T2DM who is experiencing high OS because there is evidence from many clinical trials that HRT is effective in lowering various OS biomarkers.28–30
Low education status, as a proxy for the socioeconomic status, was shown to be associated with higher OS and lower antioxidant potential in cross-sectional as well as longitudinal analyses in a previous study.31 However, this study only adjusted for age, sex, race and BMI and observed that the potential effect of education on OS was mediated by smoking, drinking and symptoms of depression. This implies that the socioeconomic status is likely not causally related to OS and is rather related to other important lifestyle or disease-oriented OS risk factors. This would be in line with our finding of education not being a predictor of high OS and speaks against a causal relationship.
Body mass index
A significant association between obesity and higher D-ROM levels was consistently observed in our analyses with patients with diabetes. However, this result might be specific for patients with diabetes because we recently showed with longitudinal data from the total ESTHER study that BMI was not associated with D-ROM levels.32 However, another biomarker for OS (total thiol levels) was significantly associated with BMI in the total ESTHER population32 and various other studies using urinary 8-epi-prostaglandin F2α, a different biomarker of lipid peroxidation, also observed associations of BMI with higher OS.33 34 Visceral body fat is known to generate proinflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6, which augment OS by increased generation of ROS and nitrogen.35 This mechanism via inflammation can also explain why BMI lost its statistical significant association with D-ROM levels after adjusting the model for the acute phase inflammatory protein CRP. In line with these thoughts, caloric restriction has been linked with the reduction of OS and healthy aging.36 Thus, prevention measures targeting weight loss in persons with pronounced abdominal adiposity might be helpful to regulate an unfavorable OS status. In addition, prevention strategies against adiposity before its onset in earlier life can also be recommended.
There is considerable evidence from previous studies about a strong relationship of current smoking with high OS.2 37 Our study adds to this existing knowledge by confirming this association in T2DM individuals. In addition, we also observed a weak association of former smoking with OS, which has also been detected by others before.38 An association of past smoking with OS is not a biologically plausible finding and might be explained by misclassification of smoking status in the cross-sectional analysis by falsely self-reported smoking status, a reuptake of smoking of some former smokers during the FU or by residual confounding. In contrast, the strong association of current smoking and OS is clinically plausible. A smoker consumes approximately 1017 oxidant molecules from each puff of cigarette smoke.39 Additionally, the direct damage by superoxide and hydrogen peroxide radical species and the corresponding inflammatory response induced during smoking can lead to higher OS in smokers.40 Subsequently, smoking cessation, which is to be recommended for a large variety of health outcomes, might also help to prevent or treat high OS.
We observed that high alcohol consumption was associated with increased odds of OS in the prospective analysis. This increased risk could be attributed to the metabolism of ethanol, which is directly involved in the production of ROS and reactive nitrogen substances (RNS) and subsequently a decrease in the concentrations of antioxidative proteins.41 Furthermore, ethanol metabolism can induce fatty acids oxidation in phospholipids,42 which can especially explain the association with D-ROM, which is a biomarker for lipid peroxidation. In contrast, moderate alcohol consumption was inversely associated with high OS in our longitudinal study. A potential explanation for this finding may be resveratrol in wine, whose antioxidative and anti-inflammatory actions are well established.43 For example, a small study among Australian adults consuming 40 mL of red wine per day for 2 weeks reported significantly elevated antioxidant status and decreased OS.44 Taken together, the potential effect of alcohol consumption on OS may be dose dependent—moderate doses may reduce OS, while higher doses may increase OS. This leads us to the recommendation that high alcohol consumption should be reduced for various health reasons, of which high OS is only one. However, subjects with high OS status and no contraindication for moderate alcohol consumption (liver disease or any addiction disorder) might profit from the consumption of low amounts of red wine (up to 1–2 glasses per day).45
We demonstrated that physically active T2DM subjects had reduced odds of having high OS. Likewise, studies have inferred similar results for young and old individuals from the general population46 47 as well as for patients with T2DM.48 Exercise induces ROS generation, which subsequently activates nuclear factor erythroid 2 signaling, which in turn increases the expression of antioxidant enzymes.48 Thus, regularly performed physical activity strengthens the antioxidant defense system. Therefore, we agree with other experts that regular physical activity should be highly recommended for patients with T2DM in order to improve their antioxidant status.49
Vegetable and fruits consumption
Vegetables and fruits contain high concentrations of antioxidative nutrients, which in turn can scavenge ROS.50 Among the most important antioxidants are fibers, polyphenols, flavonoids, vitamins A, B, C and E and tocopherols.51 Although a study in 54 patients with T2DM detected a significant association between high intakes of fruit and vegetables with decreased OS,52 we failed to detect the same among our study participants. The lack of an association with D-ROM levels in the DIANA and ESTHER study may be explained by the imprecise assessment of nutrition. Other studies with detailed food frequency questionnaires observed protective effects of fruit and vegetable intake against high OS.53 54 Generally, a change of diet with higher fruits and vegetable consumption and less red meat consumption, which is already being recommended for all patients with T2DM, should be particularly emphasized as a recommendation for T2DM patients with high OS. Possibly, communication of high OS biomarker results to these patients can help to motivate them to change their diet.
We observed that T2DM patients with HbA1c ≥7% had higher OS than study participants with lower HbA1c, which is in line with the results of a small study from Saudi Arabia, which used another biomarker of lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde (MDA)).55 However, in our study, this cross-sectional association disappeared after adjusting for CRP, and moreover, no association of HbA1c and D-ROM levels was detected in the longitudinal analysis. These findings speak against hyperglycemia as an independent risk factor for high OS in patients with T2DM.
Substantially lower D-ROM levels were observed in patients with T2DM treated with oral antidiabetics compared with non-treated T2DM patients. In a previous analysis with the ESTHER diabetes subpopulation and the DIANA study, we observed that the lower D-ROM levels of oral antidiabetic drug users was attributable to the metformin users.10 This is in agreement with results from trials with a metformin intervention.56 57 A plausible mechanism is the lipid-lowering effect of metformin, which can ultimately lead to lower levels of lipid peroxidation biomarkers.10 With regards to insulin therapy, our results for the cross-sectional (inverse association) and longitudinal analysis (positive association) were contradictory. However, the finding of the longitudinal analysis for insulin use should be treated with caution because the meta-analysis had high heterogeneity as the results from the DIANA study (positive association) and the ESTHER study (null association) did not confirm each other (online supplementary table 3). A clinical trial established evidence that insulin therapy as add-on therapy to oral antidiabetics has a protective effect on OS.58 Thus, we think that the finding from the DIANA study showing higher odds of high OS for insulin users was a finding by chance. In summary, our results support the usage of metformin in patients with high OS if the alternative is prescribing of no antidiabetic drugs. Further studies are needed to clarify whether, if oral antidiabetic therapy is not sufficient to control HbA1c, insulin add-on therapy may also be an additional option to decrease OS.
Time since diabetes diagnosis
We hypothesized that time since diabetes diagnosis might be associated with OS because diabetes-related comorbidity increases with time. However, results were not statistically significant in the cross-sectional analysis and weak (but statistically significant) in the longitudinal analysis in our study with patients with T2DM, which might be explained by adjustment for factors in the model, which could be confounders of the association of time since diabetes diagnosis and D-ROM levels (eg, diseases). Similarly, a small cross-sectional study with 42 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) observed no association of time since diabetes diagnosis with biomarkers of OS.59 Although being an important risk factor for mortality in patients with T2DM,60 our results do not suggest a strong impact of the time since diabetes diagnosis on the OS status of patients with T2DM.
Several cardiovascular diseases, renal dysfunction and history of cancer were tested for an association with OS, and none of the conditions was longitudinally associated with OS. We would have liked to compare our longitudinal findings for the medical conditions to other studies, but to the best of our knowledge no other comparable studies have been conducted so far. Only heart failure, a history of MI and a history of cancer were associated with high OS in our cross-sectional analysis. A possible explanation might be that T2DM patients with the named comorbidities have increased D-ROM levels, but the comorbidities do not cause increased OS. Several other cross-sectional studies observed increased OS biomarker levels in subjects with CVD or cancer compared with disease-free control subjects.17 61 Furthermore, the progression of diabetic nephropathy and dialysis have been found to be associated with increased oxidative damage and decreased antioxidant capacity in previous studies with patients with T2DM.62 The lack of an association of D-ROM levels and renal dysfunction in the DIANA and ESTHER study may be attributed to the low number of study participants with severe renal impairment (prevalence of eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² was 1.2% and 3.2% in the ESTHER and DIANA study, respectively). Nevertheless, our results support suggestions that early interventions against renal dysfunction and well-managed dialysis (if required) can contribute to homeostasis of OS.62 63 Contradictory to a previous, small, cross-sectional study with 100 diabetes patients, which observed an association of D-ROM levels with systolic blood pressure,27 we did not observe a relationship of D-ROM levels with hypertension. Furthermore, a previous history of stroke was associated with lower D-ROM levels in our study. However, this association was weak and may be a result of residual confounding.
Total and HDL cholesterol
We observed an association of elevated total cholesterol levels with D-ROM levels in the cross-sectional analysis but not in the longitudinal analysis. This speaks against a causal relationship between total cholesterol levels and OS. A cross-sectional association can simply be explained by the fact that D-ROM is a biomarker of lipid peroxidation and thus its concentration correlates with the concentration of lipids in the circulatory system. Previous studies have observed a close relationship of biomarkers of lipid peroxidation with hyperlipidemia, but these were all cross-sectional studies.27 64 65 In line with these doubts regarding a causal relationship, a randomized controlled trial observed no effect for simvastatin treatment on the levels of an OS biomarker.66
C reactive protein
As seen in many previous studies, increased CRP was strongly associated with high D-ROM levels in the cross-sectional analysis.67 68 It has already been shown that OS can provoke and potentiate inflammatory processes.69 Interestingly, we also observed a longitudinal association. This implies that T2DM patients with subclinical inflammation may remain at high risk for high OS in the next years and the OS status may even worsen. Thus, anti-inflammatory drugs might also be effective against OS (eg, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or corticosteroids) though their long-term use would have to carefully weigh potential benefits and harms. The novel interleukin-1ß inhibitor canakinumab may be a promising alternative.70 However, more clinical trials and evidence from postmarketing surveillance studies about the benefit–risk ratio of long-term therapy with this interesting new drug class are needed before its use can be recommended.
Strengths and limitations
Our study has several strengths and limitations. To begin with, the prospective design achieved by repeated D-ROM measurements at two time points 3–4 years apart is one of its major plus points. Furthermore, the large sample size went along with a high statistical power enabling us to detect even modest associations. Finally, analyzing two distinct cohort studies and meta-analyzing their results should ameliorate the reproducibility of our results by other studies. We did not adjust for multiple testing because the set of potential determinants of OS was chosen based on a literature search and was not data driven. Furthermore, findings in one cohort, which may have been statistically significant only by chance, could be leveled out in the meta-analysis by the results from the other cohort. Overall, heterogeneity in most of the meta-analyses was low because the T2DM study populations of the two cohorts had similar patient characteristics and harmonized variable definitions were derived, which is an additional strength of our approach.
The main limitation of our study is the observational study design. Residual confounding by unmeasured or less than perfectly measured confounders cannot be excluded (eg, dietary factors). Another limitation is that synthetic antioxidant intake was not investigated in our study. The use of vitamin supplements was largely under-reported in the question about current drug intake in both studies, because presumably vitamins are not regarded as drugs by most Germans (less than 3% of study participants reported vitamin supplements). As we did not specifically collect information on over-the-counter drug use, we decided not to include the suboptimally determined variable on vitamin supplements use in our models. Furthermore, we cannot completely exclude that a few patients with T1DM are included in the ESTHER T2DM subcohort, because the diabetes type was self-reported and 247 study participants did not report their diabetes type. However, we minimized this risk of including T1DM patients by excluding all subjects with diabetes diagnoses before the 40th birthday. Finally, we would like to state that the study results can only be generalized to Caucasian patients with T2DM, aged 40 years and older.
In this meta-analysis of two German cohort studies of patients with T2DM, we evaluated a comprehensive array of potential risk factors for high OS. For the first time, a longitudinal analysis was performed that allows to establish temporal sequence and deductions on potential causality better than cross-sectional analyses. In this regard, the most important finding is that old age, female sex, obesity, smoking, high alcohol consumption, ≥5 years since diabetes diagnosis and subclinical inflammation were longitudinally associated with increased D-ROM levels over the course of 3–4 years. These results support suggestions that a better management of the modifiable risk factors obesity, smoking, physical inactivity and high alcohol consumption may help to maintain redox balance in patients with T2DM. It is not surprising that these well-known factors for healthy aging appeared in our analysis as potential risk factors for OS. This finding may also explain the recently reported strong association of D-ROM levels with mortality in patients with T2DM.25 Taken together, these results suggest regulating these risk factors for high D-ROM levels may help to prolong the average life expectancy of patients with T2DM and to reduce the number of premature deaths.
The authors would like to thank Piet Beekhof from the Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) for performing Diacron’s reactive oxygen metabolites test measurements.
Contributors AA conducted the statistical analyses. AA wrote the first draft of the paper and BS edited it. EHJMJ contributed to the measurement of the oxidative stress biomarkers. HB, XG, DCL and YX reviewed the manuscript draft and contributed to the interpretation of the results and the discussion.
Funding This study was funded by a grant from the German Research Foundation (grant No. SCHO 1545/3-1). The Epidemiologische Studie zu Chancen der Verhütung, Früherkennung und optimierten Therapie chronischer Erkrankungen in der älteren Bevölkerung (ESTHER) study was funded by grants from the Saarland state Ministry for Social Affairs, Health, Women and Family Affairs (Saarbrücken, Germany), the Baden-Württemberg state Ministry of Science, Research and Arts (Stuttgart, Germany), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Berlin, Germany) and the Federal Ministry of Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (Berlin, Germany). The Diabetes mellitus: Neue Wege der Optimierung der allgemeinärztlichen Betreuung (DIANA) study was funded by a grant from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Berlin, Germany).
Disclaimer The funders were not involved in any of the steps in rendering this project be it design, execution, analysis, data interpretation or writing of the manuscript.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval The protocol of the ESTHER and DIANA study have been approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg. Moreover, the ESTHER study has been approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Association of Saarland and the DIANA study by the ethics committee of the Chamber of Physicians of Baden-Württemberg. Both studies are being conducted in adherence with the declaration of Helsinki and written informed consent has been obtained from all study participants.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement No data are available. The ESTHER and DIANA data cannot be made publicly available due to legal restrictions. However, data can be shared on the basis of research proposals that are in accordance with the study’s aims.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.