Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Comparison of weight-based insulin titration (WIT) and glucose-based insulin titration using basal-bolus algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, clinical study
  1. Xiaodan Zhang1,
  2. Tong Zhang2,
  3. Guangda Xiang3,
  4. Wenbo Wang4,
  5. Yanli Li1,
  6. Tao Du1,
  7. Yunjuan Zhao1,
  8. Singla Sethiel Mosha1,
  9. Wangen Li1
  1. 1Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  2. 2Department of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  3. 3Department of Endocrinology, Wuhan General Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Wuhan, China
  4. 4Department of Endocrinology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
  1. Correspondence to Dr Wangen Li; liwg660{at}126.com

Abstract

Introduction Subcutaneous administration of insulin is the preferred method for achieving glucose control in non-critically ill patients with diabetes. Glucose-based titration protocols were widely applied in clinical practice. However, most of these algorithms are experience-based and there is considerable variability and complexity. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of a weight-based insulin titration algorithm versus glucose-based algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Research design and methods This randomized clinical trial was carried out at four centers in the South, Central and North China. Inpatients with T2DM were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weight-based and glucose-based insulin titration algorithms. The primary outcome was the length of time for reaching blood glucose (BG) targets (fasting BG (FBG) and 2-hour postprandial BG (2hBG) after three meals). The secondary outcome included insulin dose for achieving glycemic control and the incidence of hypoglycemia during hospitalization.

Results Between January 2016 and June 2019, 780 patients were screened, and 575 completed the trial (283 in the weight-based group and 292 in the glucose-based group). The lengths of time for reaching BG targets at four time points were comparable between two groups. FBG reached targets within 3 days and 2hBG after three meals within 4 days. There is no significant difference in insulin doses between two groups at the end of the study. The total daily dosage was about 1 unit/kg/day, and the ratio of basal-to-bolus was about 2:3 in both groups. The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in both groups, and severe hypoglycemia was not detected in either of the groups.

Conclusions Weight-based insulin titration algorithm is equally effective and safe in hospitalized patients with T2DM compared with glucose-based algorithm.

Trial registration number NCT03220919.

  • inpatient diabetes management
  • insulin dose management
  • glucose
  • weight
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors WL contributed to the study design and interpretation of data, and drafted the report. All authors contributed to study protocol discussion, data collection and writing the manuscript.

  • Funding This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81800726).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval The study protocol and consent form were approved by the institutional review board of each participating institute (registration number 2015067).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available on reasonable request to Wangen Li, liwg660@126.com.