Article Text

Download PDFPDF

PERsistent Sitagliptin treatment & Outcomes (PERS&O 2.0) study, long-term results: a real-world observation on DPP4-inhibitor effectiveness
  1. Antonio Carlo Bossi1,
  2. Valentina De Mori1,
  3. Carlotta Galeone2,
  4. Davide Pietro Bertola1,
  5. Margherita Gaiti1,
  6. Annalisa Balini1,
  7. Denise Berzi1,
  8. Franco Forloni1,
  9. Giancarla Meregalli1,
  10. Federica Turati2
  1. 1Endocrine Diseases Unit, Diabetes Regional Centre, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy
  2. 2Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Antonio Carlo Bossi; acbossi{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction Sitagliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Limited real-world data on its effectiveness and safety are available from an Italian population.

Research design and methods We evaluated long-term clinical data from the single-arm PERsistent Sitagliptin Treatment & Outcomes (PERS&O) study, which collected information on 440 patients with TD2 (275 men, 165 women; mean age 64.1 years; disease median duration: 12 years) treated with sitagliptin ‘add-on’. For each patient, we estimated the 10-year cardiovascular (CV) risk using the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Risk Engine (RE). Drug survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves; repeated measures mixed effects models were used to evaluate the evolution of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and CV risk during sitagliptin treatment.

Results At baseline, most patients were overweight or obese (median body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) 30.2); median HbA1c was 8.4%; median fasting plasma glucose: 172 mg/dL; median UKPDS RE score: 24.8%, being higher in men (median 30.2%) than in women (median 17.0%) as expected. Median follow-up from starting sitagliptin treatment was 5.6 years. From Kaplan-Meier curves, the estimated median drug survival was 32.8 months when considering discontinuation for any cause and 58.4 months when considering discontinuation for loss of efficacy. A significant improvement in HbA1c was evident during treatment with sitagliptin (p<0.01): the reduction was rapid (median HbA1c after 4–6 months: 7.5%) and continued at longer follow-up. When comparing patients treated with sitagliptin versus those stopping sitagliptin and switching to another antihyperglycemic drug, we detected a significant difference in the evolution of HbA1c in favor of patients who continued sitagliptin treatment. The UKPDS RE score at 10 years and the BMI significantly improved during treatment with sitagliptin (p<0.001). Adverse events were relatively uncommon.

Conclusion Patients with T2D treated with sitagliptin achieved an improvement in metabolic control and a reduction in CV risk and did not experience relevant adverse events.

  • dipeptidyl peptidase 4
  • drug-related side effects and adverse reactions
  • risk assessment
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors ACB, VDM, CG, and FT formulated ideas and designed the study; VDM, DPB, MG, DB, AB, FF and GM collected clinical data; CG and FT performed the statistical analysis; ACB, CG and FT wrote the manuscript; all authors reviewed and signed the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding This study was funded by Treviglio Hospital Health Management.

  • Disclaimer Preliminary reports of the study have been accepted (as e-poster presentation) at the 28th SID Annual Meeting (Rimini, Italy, 2–5 December 2020).

  • Competing interests ACB reports grants from Lilly Italia SpA, grants from Novo-Nordisk Italia SpA, personal fees from Sanofi Italia SpA, personal fees from Johnson & Johnson Italia SpA, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Italia SpA, grants from Bayer SA, personal fees from MSD Italia SpA, personal fees from Astra Zeneca Italia SpA, and grants from Pikdare Italia SpA, outside the submitted work.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval Bergamo Ethic Committee approved the study (n. 231/18).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Data will be available for 1 year after publication upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.