Article Text

Circulating sex hormone binding globulin levels are modified with intensive lifestyle intervention, but their changes did not independently predict diabetes risk in the Diabetes Prevention Program
  1. Vanita R Aroda1,2,
  2. Costas A Christophi3,
  3. Sharon L Edelstein3,
  4. Leigh Perreault4,
  5. Catherine Kim5,
  6. Sherita H Golden6,
  7. Edward Horton7,
  8. Kieren J Mather8
  9. DPP Research Group
    1. 1MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA
    2. 2Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    3. 3The Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University Milken Institute of Public Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
    4. 4Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
    5. 5Departments of Medicine, Obstetrics & Gynecology, and Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
    6. 6Division of Endocrinology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
    7. 7Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    8. 8Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
    1. Correspondence to Dr Vanita R Aroda; varoda{at}bwh.harvard.edu

    Abstract

    Introduction Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels are reported to be inversely associated with diabetes risk. It is unknown whether diabetes prevention interventions increase SHBG and whether resultant changes in SHBG affect diabetes risk. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin changed circulating SHBG and if resultant changes influenced diabetes risk in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).

    Research design and methods This is a secondary analysis from the DPP (1996–2001), a randomized trial of ILS or metformin versus placebo on diabetes risk over a mean follow-up of 3.2 years. The DPP was conducted across 27 academic study centers in the USA. Men, premenopausal and postmenopausal women without hormone use in the DPP were evaluated. The DPP included overweight/obese persons with elevated fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance. Main outcomes measures were changes in SHBG levels at 1 year and risk of diabetes over 3 years.

    Results ILS resulted in significantly higher increases (postmenopausal women: p<0.01) or smaller decrements (men: p<0.05; premenopausal women: p<0.01) in SHBG compared with placebo or metformin. Changes in SHBG were primarily attributable to changes in adiposity. There were no consistent associations of change in SHBG with the risk of diabetes by treatment arm or participant group.

    Conclusions Lifestyle intervention may be associated with favorable changes in circulating SHBG, which is largely due to changes in adiposity. Changes in circulating SHBG do not independently predict reductions in diabetes incidence.

    • diabetes mellitus
    • type 2
    • primary prevention
    • hormone
    • life style
    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Supplementary materials

    • Supplementary Data

      This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Footnotes

    • Contributors The manuscript was conceived by VRA and KJM, with manuscript questions and analytic plan designed by VRA, CAC, CK, SLE and KJM. VRA wrote the manuscript, interpreted the data, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. CAC contributed to writing, data analysis, data interpretation, critical review and revision. SLE contributed to data analysis, data interpretation, critical review and revision. LP, CK, SHG, EH and KJM contributed to data interpretation, critical review and revision. All authors had access to the data and all authors agreed to submit the final manuscript. At the time of publication KJM was a full-time employee of Eli Lilly and Company. However, prior to employment at Eli Lilly and Company, KJM served as Principal Investigator for this NIH funded study. As such, data collection occurred prior to and independent of this employment and therefore, data analysis and preparation of the manuscript were independent of Eli Lilly and Company.

    • Funding The DPP/DPPOS was funded by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, award U01 DK048489.

    • Disclaimer The opinions expressed are those of the investigators and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Ethics approval All 27 DPP clinical study centers, as well as the DPP Coordinating Center, had institutional review board approvals.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data availability statement Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. In accordance with the NIH Public Access Policy, we continue to provide all manuscripts to PubMed Central including this manuscript. DPP/DPPOS has provided the protocols and lifestyle and medication intervention manuals to the public through its public website (https://www.dppos.org). The DPPOS abides by the NIDDK data sharing policy and implementation guidance as required by the NIH/NIDDK (https://www.niddkrepository.org/studies/dppos/)

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.