Individuals (% T2D) | Gender | Age | Income | Education | Immigration | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | |||||||||
Women | Men | 40–49 | 50–59 | 60–69 | 70–79 | 80–84 | High | Medium | Low | High | Low | Native | Immigrant | Prevalence ratio (99% CI) | |||||||
2 209 758 (4.7) | Ref | Ref | |||||||||||||||||||
2 124 272 (6.7) | 1.51 (1.50 to 1.53) | 1.57 (1.55 to 1.58) | |||||||||||||||||||
1 222 368 (1.5) | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||||||||||||||
1 110 124 (3.9) | 2.55 (2.50 to 2.61) | 2.56 (2.50 to 2.62) | 2.67 (2.61 to 2.73) | 2.52 (2.46 to 2.58) | 2.56 (2.50 to 2.62) | 2.61 (2.55 to 2.67) | |||||||||||||||
1 115 015 (7.6) | 4.96 (4.86 to 5.06) | 4.98 (4.88 to 5.09) | 5.61 (5.49 to 5.72) | 4.90 (4.80 to 5.00) | 5.06 (4.96 to 5.17) | 5.49 (5.38 to 5.61) | |||||||||||||||
654 694 (11.0) | 7.16 (7.01 to 7.31) | 7.28 (7.13 to 7.44) | 7.30 (7.15 to 7.45) | 6.93 (6.78 to 7.08) | 7.31 (7.15 to 7.46) | 7.37 (7.21 to 7.52) | |||||||||||||||
231 829 (11.4) | 7.44 (7.26 to 7.63) | 7.76 (7.57 to 7.95) | 7.06 (6.89 to 7.24) | 6.99 (6.82 to 7.16) | 7.68 (7.49 to 7.87) | 7.35 (7.17 to 7.53) | |||||||||||||||
1 535 656 (4.6) | Ref | Ref | |||||||||||||||||||
1 348 687 (5.9) | 1.32 (1.30 to 1.34) | 1.22 (1.21 to 1.24) | |||||||||||||||||||
1 449 687 (6.5) | 1.61 (1.59 to 1.63) | 1.42 (1.40 to 1.44) | |||||||||||||||||||
1 442 573 (3.9) | Ref | Ref | |||||||||||||||||||
2 891 457 (6.5) | 1.55 (1.53 to 1.57) | 1.45 (1.43 to 1.47) | |||||||||||||||||||
3 736 190 (5.4) | Ref | Ref | |||||||||||||||||||
587 840 (7.3) | 1.53 (1.51 to 1.55) | 1.46 (1.44 to 1.48) | |||||||||||||||||||
The five multicategorical strata with the lowest prevalence of T2D | |||||||||||||||||||||
69 689 (0.5) | Ref | ||||||||||||||||||||
87 561 (0.6) | 1.15 (0.97 to 1.37) | ||||||||||||||||||||
69 254 (0.7) | 1.24 (1.04 to 1.48) | ||||||||||||||||||||
52 388 (0.8) | 1.37 (1.13 to 1.64) | ||||||||||||||||||||
72 036 (0.8) | 1.39 (1.17 to 1.65) | ||||||||||||||||||||
The five multicategorical strata with the highest prevalence of T2D | |||||||||||||||||||||
7949 (15.1) | 27.56 (26.69 to 32.07) | ||||||||||||||||||||
3872 (16.1) | 29.45 (24.91 to 34.81) | ||||||||||||||||||||
16 960 (16.4) | 29.9 4 (26.01 to 34.45) | ||||||||||||||||||||
3170 (16.8) | 30.67 (25.81 to 36.46) | ||||||||||||||||||||
10 570 (17.6) | 32.10 (27.78 to 37.10) | ||||||||||||||||||||
AUC | 0.684 (0.683 to 0.686) | 0.698 (0.697 to 0.699) | 0.698 (0.696 to 0.699) | 0.695 (0.694 to 0.696) | 0.692 (0.690 to 0.693) | 0.717 (0.716 to 0.719) | 0.720 (0.719 to 0.721) | ||||||||||||||
ΔAUC | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.011 | 0.008 | 0.033 | 0.036 |
The colored boxes mark which categories the prevalence ratios concern, which in the multicategorical variable (model 7) are combinations of variables. Values are PR (prevalence ratios) with 99% CIs; AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) with 99% CI; ΔAUC (change in the AUC value compared with model 1).