Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes who received exenatide plus pioglitazone or insulin treatment

Controls (n=18)Exenatide plus pioglitazone (n=21)Basal-bolus insulin (n=17)P value
Age, years53.0±11.050.1±9.454.9±7.50.30
Male, n (%)13/18 (72.2)11/21(52.4)12/17(70.6)0.35
Duration of diabetes, yearsNA10.0±5.913.1±9.30.24
HbA1c, mmol/mol41.6±5.092.5±18.8****89.9±22.5****<0.0001
HbA1c, %6.0±0.510.6±1.7****10.4±2.1****
Total cholesterol, mmol/L5.0±1.04.7±0.65.3±1.30.17
Triglyceride, mmol/L1.4±0.52.0±1.41.8±1.00.37
HDL, mmol/L1.2±0.31.3±0.61.2±0.40.87
LDL, mmol/L3.2±0.92.6±0.73.1±1.00.10
Systolic BP, mm Hg143.7±12.7126.4±17.9*130.8±19.30.02
Diastolic BP, mm Hg82.1±6.678.2±13.977.6±10.40.50
Body weight, kg75.8±4.787.9±19.584.3±13.70.07
BMI, kg/m228.8±3.432.4±6.730.4±5.90.2
Diabetic retinopathy, n (%)5/16(31.3)4/9(44.4)0.51
Neuropathic pain, n (%)4/18(22.2)2/12(16.7)0.71
CNFD, fibers/mm233.7±5.726.1±7.9**28.8±9.10.01
CNBD, branches/mm2110.4±45.057.0±31.6***70.3±31.2**<0.001
CNFL, mm/mm225.1±4.317.8±4.9****19.4±5.7**0.0001
VPT, V7.2±4.17.3±4.611.4±7.40.08
ESC feet, µS66.9±18.459.8±25.767.2±12.00.55
  • Numeric variables and frequency distribution for categorical variables are summarized as means±SD or n (%). Variables were compared using one-way ANOVA except for duration of diabetes which was compared using unpaired t-test. Categorical variables were compared using χ2. Variables that were significantly different between controls and patients with T2D were denoted as *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001, ****p≤0.0001.

  • BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CNBD, corneal nerve branch density; CNFD, corneal nerve fiber density; CNFL, corneal nerve fiber length; ESC, electrochemical skin conductance; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NA, not available; T2D, type 2 diabetes; VPT, vibration perception threshold.