Table 2

Between-group comparisons of the changes in the primary, key secondary and exploratory outcomes from baseline to 12-month follow-up

nInterventionnStandard careDifference or ORP value
Primary outcome
 SF-36 PCS (points)640.8 (−0.7 to 2.3)34−2.4 (−4.6 to −0.1)3.2 (0.5 to 5.9)0.020
Key secondary outcomes
 SF-36 PCS responders, n (%)†6119 (30)346 (18)4.04 (0.94 to 17.43)‡0.061
 SF-36 MCS (points)64−0.4 (−2.5 to 1.7)340.6 (−2.6 to 3.7)−1.0 (−4.8 to 2.8)(0.600)
 SF-36 MCS responders, n (%)†6116 (25)349 (26)2.43 (0.32 to 18.54)‡(0.392)
Other exploratory outcomes
 MHC-SF (points)63−0.3 (−2.4 to 1.9)331.3 (−1.8 to 4.5)−1.6 (−5.4 to 2.2)(0.405)
 Languishing, n (%)583 (5)260 (0)NA*
 Moderately mentally healthy, n (%)8 (14)7 (27)0.16 (0.03 to 0.87)§(0.034)
 Flourishing, n (%)47 (81)19 (73)2.96 (0.53 to 16.69)§(0.218)
 WEMWBS (points)582.0 (0.9 to 3.2)252.5 (0.8 to 4.2)−0.4 (−2.5 to 1.6)(0.675)
 SF-36 Physical functioning (points)641.2 (0.3 to 2.1)34−1.0 (−2.3 to 0.4)2.2 (0.6 to 3.8)(0.008)
 SF-36 Physical role functioning (points)64−1.1 (−3.0 to 0.7)34−2.7 (−5.5 to 0.0)1.6 (−1.7 to 4.9)(0.344)
 SF-36 Bodily pain (points)64−1.5 (−3.6 to 0.7)34−3.9 (−7.1 to −0.7)2.5 (−1.4 to 6.3)(0.203)
 SF-36 General health (points)643.5 (1.9 to 5.1)340.2 (−2.2 to 2.6)3.3 (0.4 to 6.2)(0.026)
 SF-36 Vitality (points)642.0 (−0.1 to 4.1)34−0.1 (−3.2 to 3.0)2.1 (−1.7 to 5.9)(0.270)
 SF-36 Mental health (points)640.5 (−1.7 to 2.7)34−1.0 (−4.3 to 2.4)1.4 (−2.6 to 5.4)(0.481)
 SF-36 Emotional role functioning (points)64−1.6 (−3.5 to 0.3)34−0.0 (−2.9 to 2.8)−1.6 (−5.0 to 1.9)(0.377)
 SF-36 Social functioning (points)64−1.1 (−2.8 to 0.7)34−0.2 (−2.9 to 2.4)−0.8 (−4.0 to 2.4)(0.616)
 GMS Positive affect (points)592.3 (0.9 to 3.8)281.0 (−1.3 to 3.2)1.3 (−1.3 to 4.0)(0.324)
 GMS Negative affect (points)59−1.0 (−2.3 to 0.3)28−0.6 (−2.6 to 1.4)−0.3 (−2.7 to 2.0)(0.781)
  • For continuous outcomes, estimates are adjusted least squares means (95% CI) from linear mixed models. For dichotomous outcomes, estimates are adjusted ORs (95% CI) from logistic regression with repeated measures. Group-wise estimates for dichotomous outcomes are n (%) at 12-month follow-up. P values in parentheses should be interpreted with caution, since they represent analyses performed after the gatekeeping procedure indicated discontinuation of analyses.

  • *The model failed to converge.

  • †Responders defined as participants achieving a clinically significant improvement from baseline to 12-month follow-up: PCS improvement ≥3.4 points, MCS improvement ≥4.6 points.

  • ‡Numbers represent the adjusted OR (95% CI).

  • §Numbers represent the adjusted OR (95% CI) comparing current category to the two other categories combined.

  • GMS, global mood scale; MCS, mental component score; MHC-SF, mental health continuum-short form; NA, not applicable; PCS, physical component score; SF-36, 36-item short form health survey; WEMWBS, Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale.