Table 3

Strategies targeted at young adults with diabetes to try and improve DRS uptake and perceptions of their effectiveness

Strategy directed at person with diabetesAdopting strategyPerceived effectiveness
n (%)Extremely effectiveVery effectiveModerately effectiveSlightly effectiveNot effectiveMean
(SD)*
Dedicated clinics for young people35 (34.3)4 (11.4)11 (31.4)11 (31.4)6 (17.1)3 (8.6)3.20 (1.13)
Mobile screening units57 (55.9)9 (15.7)9 (15.7)26 (45.6)12 (21.1)1 (1.8)3.23 (1.02)
Screening within the community101 (99.0)19 (18.8)33 (32.7)40 (39.6)9 (8.9)0 (0.0)3.61 (0.89)
Integrating eye screening with other diabetes services (eg, ‘one-stop shop’ clinics)46 (45.1)17 (37.0)13 (28.3)13 (28.3)2 (4.3)1 (2.2)3.94 (1.02)
Self-management programs/training for people with diabetes47 (46.1)3 (6.4)19 (40.4)17 (36.2)6 (12.8)2 (4.3)3.36 (0.85)
Provision of information about diabetic retinopathy99 (97.1)10 (10.1)20 (20.1)42 (42.4)25 (25.3)2 (2.0)3.11 (0.97)
Peer support groups44 (43.1)3 (6.8)15 (34.1)18 (40.9)8 (18.2)0 (0.0)3.30 (0.85)
Prompts/reminders (eg, text messages, letters, phone calls)102 (100)27 (26.5)35 (34.3)28 (27.5)11 (10.8)1 (1.0)3.75 (1.00)
Continuing to offer screening appointments to people who do not attend102 (100)16 (15.7)17 (16.7)40 (39.2)22 (21.6)7 (6.9)3.13 (1.13)
  • *Mean score represents effectiveness of strategy on a 5-point scale (extremely effective=5; not effective=1).

  • DRS, diabetic retinopathy screening.