Table 2

Inter-rater reliability of peripheral neurological tests, reported as Cohen’s kappa (К), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) or per cent agreement

ReferenceFour-site monofilament128 Hz tuning forkVibration perception thresholdPinprickReflexesProprioception
Arshad et al23κ=0.33 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.51)κ=0.58 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.71)
Bax et al24(Right) κ=0.49 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.69) (Left): κ=0.51 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.71)Biothesiometer hallux (right): κ=0.65 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.84)
Hallux (left): κ=0.58 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.70)
κ=0.58 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.72)
Chew et al35κ=0.6 (95% CI 0.19 to 1)
Hirschfeld et al38κ=0.07 (left) κ=0.007 (right)
Lanting et al26κ=0.61 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.77) p<0.01κ=0.68 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.95), p<0.01Neurothesiometer κ=0.61 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.77), p<0.01
Lasca et al27κ=0.86 p<0.001
Maser et al39κ=0.26 (% agreement: 75%)κ=0.48 (% agreement: 81%)
Paisley et al (2001)33Neurothesiometer κ=0.51κ=0.35
Smieja et al28κ=0.31 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.45)κ=0.36 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.51)κ=0.59 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.71)κ=0.28 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.48)
Tentolouris et al29κ=0.624 (95% CI 0.524 to 0.727) κ=0.678 (95% CI 0.576 to 0.780) κ=0.615 (95% CI 0.508 to 0.722)
van Deursen et al30Maxivibrometer ICC: 0.96
Biothesiometer ICC: 0.93