Table 3

HRs with 95% CIs and p values of Cox proportional hazards regression models for sulfonylurea versus other OHAs

Model typeOutcomes
All-cause mortalityCardiovascular eventsMajor hypoglycemic episodes
HR
(95% CI)
P valueHR
(95% CI)
P valuesHR
(95% CI)
P values
Unadjusted2.23
(1.65 to 3.03)
<0.0011.29
(1.02 to 1.63)
0.0314.72
(2.43 to 9.15)
<0.001
IPTW1.44
(1.12 to 1.84)
0.0050.99
(0.81 to 1.22)
0.922.78
(1.66 to 4.66)
<0.001
Propensity matched2.25
(1.39 to 3.64)
<0.0010.78
(0.52 to 1.19)
0.253.50
(1.15 to 10.63)
0.027
IPTW (no censoring for insulin or additional OHAs)1.35
(1.03 to 1.77)
0.0281.00
(0.79 to 1.26)
1.002.88
(1.62 to 5.10)
<0.001
IPTW (censoring after 30-day grace period)1.73
(1.26 to 2.34)
<0.0011.11
(0.86 to 1.42)
0.423.75
(1.90 to 7.39)
<0.001
Stratified by era using IPTW
Sulfonylurea versus pre-2008 OHAs0.87
(0.66 to 1.15)
0.320.74
(0.57 to 0.95)
0.019
Sulfonylurea versus post-2008 OHAs3.33
(2.02 to 5.49)
<0.0011.40
(1.01 to 1.93)
0.041
  • IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weight; OHA, oral antihyperglycemic agent.