Table 3

The association of insulin resistance assessed by HOMA-IR and imaging features of cSVD

OutcomesQuartiles of HOMA-IREvent, n (%)Model 1*Model 2†Model 3‡
Adjusted OR/cOR§ (95% CI)P valueAdjusted OR/cOR (95% CI)P valueAdjusted OR/cOR (95% CI)P value
WMH burden¶Q1 (≤1.1)110 (16.4)refrefref
Q2 (1.1–1.6)97 (13.9)0.92 (0.67 to 1.25)0.590.90 (0.66 to 1.24)0.510.78 (0.56 to 1.09)0.14
Q3 (1.6–2.2)98 (14.4)0.97 (0.71 to 1.33)0.870.95 (0.69 to 1.31)0.850.80 (0.56 to 1.13)0.21
Q4 (≥2.2)123 (17.5)1.27 (0.94 to 1.72)0.121.23 (0.90 to 1.69)0.190.94 (0.64 to 1.36)0.72
Severe ARWMC**Q1 (≤1.1)36 (5.4)refrefref
Q2 (1.1–1.6)32 (4.6)1.00 (0.61 to 1.65)1.000.98 (0.58 to 1.63)0.930.84 (0.50 to 1.43)0.53
Q3 (1.6–2.2)39 (5.7)1.33 (0.82 to 2.17)0.251.33 (0.80 to 2.20)0.271.11 (0.64 to 1.90)0.72
Q4 (≥2.2)42 (6.0)1.42 (0.88 to 2.30)0.161.39 (0.84 to 2.31)0.201.05 (0.58 to 1.89)0.88
LacuneQ1 (≤1.1)29 (4.3)refrefref
Q2 (1.1–1.6)36 (5.2)1.52 (0.91 to 2.54)0.111.48 (0.87 to 2.52)0.151.26 (0.72 to 2.18)0.42
Q3 (1.6–2.2)35 (5.1)1.65 (0.98 to 2.78)0.061.66 (0.97 to 2.86)0.071.35 (0.75 to 2.41)0.32
Q4 (≥2.2)40 (5.7)1.90 (1.14 to 3.17)0.011.90 (1.11 to 3.25)0.021.34 (0.72 to 2.51)0.36
Moderate-to-severe PVS††Q1 (≤1.1)77 (11.5)refrefref
Q2 (1.1–1.6)47 (6.8)0.67 (0.45 to 1.00)0.050.69 (0.45 to 1.03)0.070.62 (0.40 to 0.94)0.02
Q3 (1.6–2.2)65 (9.5)1.09 (0.75 to 1.59)0.661.16 (0.78 to 1.70)0.471.05 (0.69 to 1.59)0.83
Q4 (≥2.2)74 (10.5)1.26 (0.87 to 1.83)0.211.34 (0.91 to 1.98)0.141.15 (0.73 to 1.81)0.55
CMBsQ1 (≤1.1)77 (11.5)refrefref
Q2 (1.1–1.6)64 (9.2)0.88 (0.61 to 1.25)0.470.87 (0.61 to 1.26)0.460.89 (0.61 to 1.30)0.56
Q3 (1.6–2.2)53 (7.8)0.76 (0.52 to 1.10)0.150.74 (0.51 to 1.10)0.130.79 (0.52 to 1.20)0.26
Q4 (≥2.2)72 (10.3)1.05 (0.74 to 1.49)0.801.05 (0.73 to 1.51)0.801.14 (0.74 to 1.75)0.56
  • Significant p values have been presentd in bold.

  • *Model 1: multivariable regression model which was adjusted for age and gender.

  • †Model 2: model 2 adjusted for model 1+medical history including coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, dyslipidemia and stroke, smoking, alcohol intake, and medications including lipid-lowering, antiplatelet, anticoagulants.

  • ‡Model 3: model 3 adjusted for model 2+medical history of hypertension, medications of antihypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index.

  • §Ordinal logistic regression model was performed for WMH burden, total ARWMC score, and BG-PVS burden, and reported as cOR with 95% CIs, whereas logistic regression model was performed for lacunes and CMBs, and reported as OR with 95% CIs.

  • ¶WMH burden was defined as either confluent deep WMH (Fazekas score 2 or 3) or irregular periventricular WMH extending into the deep white matter (Fazekas score 3).

  • **Based on the total ARWMC scale score, patients were divided into three groups: no ARWMC (score 0), mild-to-moderate ARWMC (score 1–10), and severe ARWMC (score >10).

  • ††Moderate-to-severe PVS was defined as the PVS in the BG with grade 2–4.

  • ARWMC, age-related white matter changes; BG, basal ganglia; CMBs, cerebral microbleeds; cOR, common OR; cSVD, cerebral small vessel disease; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; PVS, perivascular spaces; ref, reference; WMH, white matter hyperintensities.