Skip to main content
Log in

Simplified diagnostic criteria for diabetic distal polyneuropathy Preliminary data of a multicentre study in the Campania region

  • Originals
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diagnostic procedures recommended for diabetic neuropathy are rather complex and there is the risk that they may be applied only in highly specialized research centres and not in other more basic health service centres that recruit large numbers of diabetic patients. This consideration highlights the need for rapid and precise diagnostic procedures for the screening and follow-up of diabetic patients. In this paper we describe a simplified diagnostic protocol for distal polyneuropathy (DP), which is the most common form of peripheral neuropathy associated with diabetes. We performed an electronneurographic examination (ENG) based on a five-nerve evaluation in 204 diabetic subjects, and took it as the standard. Its reproducibility preliminarily assessed with a test-retest evaluation was 100%. DP was found in 47 of the 204 diabetic patients on the basis of an alteration in at least two nerves. Other clinical parameters, including a questionnaire on symptoms, a clinical neurological examination (NE), and the vibration perception threshold (VPT) were evaluated. The variability coefficient was not significant for all clinical parameters in a selected group of diabetic patients (questionnaire = 21,2%, NE=5%, VPT=16.5%). The sensitivities and specificities of the questionnaire, NE, and VPT in comparison with ENG were 87% and 60% for the questionnaire, 94% and 92% for NE, and 64% and 97% for VPT, respectively. Thus, the use of ENG permitted the recognition of DP in 14% of patients who were still asymptomatic. Finally, a four-nerve ENG was compared with the five-nerve procedure, and the concordance between the two tests was 100%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melton LJ, Dyck PJ, Epidemiology. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Asbury A, Winegrad AI, Porte D (eds) Diabetic Neuropathy. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 27–35, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  2. Palumbo PJ, Elveback LR, Whisnant JP, Neurologic complications of diabetes mellitus: transient ischemic attack, stroke, and peripheral neuropathy. Adv Neurol 19:593–602, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas PK, Eliasson SG, Diabetic neuropathy. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Asbury A, Winegrad AI, Porte D (eds) Diabetic neuropathy. Sounders, Philadelphia, pp 1773–1810, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dyck PJ, Detection, characterization, and staging of polyneuropathy assessed n diabetic. Muscle Nerve 11:21–23, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dyck PJ, Kratz KM, Lehman KA, Karnes JL, Melton III LJ, O'Brien PC, Litchy WJ, Windebank AJ, Smith BE, Low PA, Service FJ, Rizza RA, Zimmerman BR, The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study: design, criteria for types of neuropathy, selection bias, and reproducibility of neuropathic tests. Neurology 41:799–807, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scionti L, Bottini P, Ciabattoni PP, Coletti A. Il protocollo del Gruppo di Studio Italiano sulla Neuropatia Diabetica. In: Fedele D, Boulon JM (eds) La neuropatia Diabetica. CIC, Rom, pp 121–129, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  7. Consensus Statement, Repor and recommendations of the Sand Antonio Conference on diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 37: 1000–1004, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dyk PJ, O'Brien P, Meaningful degrees of prevention or improvement of nerve conduction in controlled clinical trials of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 12:649–652, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fedele D, Bax G, Cardone D, Lo screenig ambulatoriale della neuropatia diabetica. Rec Progr Diabetol 1:183–189, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dyk PJ, Sherman WR, Hallcher LM, Human diabetic endoneurial sorbitol, fructose and myo-inositol related to surval nerve morphometry. Ann Neurol 8:590–596, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dyck PJ, Evaluative procedure to detect, characterize, and assess the severity of diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 8:48–51, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dyk PJ, O'Brien P, Meaningful degrees of prevention or improvement of nerve conduction in controlled clinical trials of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 11:592–597, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steward JD, Aguayo AJ, compression and entrapment neuropathies: treatment. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Lambert EM, Bunge R (eds) peripheral neuropathy. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1458–1561, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  14. Malzak P, The McGill pain questionnaire: major prospectives and scoring methods. Pain 1:277–282, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bax G, Bellavere F, Cardone C, Guarini L, Grandis O, Paiusco P, Carraro M, Fedele D, La soglia di percezione vibratoria con biotesiometro nei soggetti normali e nei diabetici. G Ital Diabetol 9:9–16, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  16. WHO Expert Commettee on Diabetes Mellitus, Technical Report Series no. 646. World Health Organisation, Geneva, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gentile S, Orlando C, Methodogical approach to the study of the evaluation of vibratory snsitivity in the diabetic neuropathy (abstract). Eur J Clin Invest 21(2):20, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  18. Orlando C, Palumbo C, Cannavaccioulo S, Persico M, Gentile S, Due comuni cause di errore in biotesiometria: falso allarme e latenza percezione-risposta. Il Diabete 3(2):843–846, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steward JD, Aguayo AJ, Compression and entrapment neuropathies. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Lambert EM, Bunge R (eds) Peripheral neuropathy. Philadelphia, Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1435–1457, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kimura J, Nerve conduction and electroneurography. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Lambert EM, Bunge R (eds) peripheral neuropathy. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 919–966, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  21. Galen RS, Gambino SR, Beyond normality: the predictive value and efficiency of medical diagnoses. John Wiley, New York, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fleiss JL, Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley, New York, pp 223–235, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  23. dyck PJ, Karnes J, O'Brien PC, Diagnosis, staging, and classification of diabetic neuropathy and associations with other complication. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Asbury A, Winegard A, Porte D (eds) diabetic neuropathy. Saunders., Philadelphia, pp 36–44, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.Goldberg GM, Lindblom U, Standardized method of determining vibratory perception thresholds for diagnosis and screening in neurological investigation. J Neurol 42:793–803, 1979

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

Southern Italy Multicentre Study on Diabetic Neuropathy Group: M. Agrusta, E. Del Vecchio, C. Lambiase,Salerno; V. Ammaturo, C. Bocchino, G. Nunziata,Nola; V. Armentano, M. Di Sabato, M. Persico, M. Porcellini, D. Vitale, F.P. Volpe,Napoli; V. Carandente,Pompei; G. Conti, A. Esposito,Cava dei Tirreni; G. D'Alessandro, C. Di Somma,Torre Annunziata; G. De Simone, G. Murolo, C. Orlando,Castellammare di Stabia; P. Esposito, G. Pierro,Nocera Inferiore; L. Lucibelli,Torre Anunziata; L. Pappalardo,Portici; D. Pascucci,Benevento; C. Scurini,Avellino; M. R. Vigliotta,Caserta

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gentile, S., Turco, S., Corigliano, G. et al. Simplified diagnostic criteria for diabetic distal polyneuropathy Preliminary data of a multicentre study in the Campania region. Acta Diabetol 32, 7–12 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00581037

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00581037

Key words

Navigation