Elsevier

Annals of Epidemiology

Volume 24, Issue 11, November 2014, Pages 809-816
Annals of Epidemiology

Original article
Gamma-glutamyl transferase and risk of type II diabetes: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.09.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • There is a nonlinear relationship between GGT and risk of T2DM

  • In males, there is a steeper increase in T2DM risk at GGT levels 4.5 to 23 U/L followed by a gradual increase in risk

  • In females, risk of T2DM starts to increase at GGT levels of 7 U/L

  • In a comparison of extreme thirds of baseline levels of GGT, there is a 30% higher risk of T2DM.

  • Assays for GGT have the potential to aid in the identification of individuals at high risk of T2DM

Abstract

Purpose

We assessed the nature of the dose-response relationship between gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels and risk of incident type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the general population.

Methods

Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of published prospective studies. Relevant studies were identified in a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up to June 2014. We examined a potential nonlinear relationship using restricted cubic splines.

Results

Of the 300 titles reviewed, we included 24 cohort studies with data on 177,307 participants and 11,155 T2DM cases. In pooled analysis of 16 studies with relevant data, there was evidence of a nonlinear association between GGT and T2DM risk in both males (P for nonlinearity = .02) and females (P for nonlinearity = .0005). In a comparison of extreme thirds of baseline levels of GGT, relative risk for T2DM in pooled analysis of all 24 studies was 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.27–1.42). There was heterogeneity among the studies (P < .001), which was to a large part explained by blood sample used, study size, degree of confounder adjustment, and quality of studies.

Conclusions

Circulating level of GGT contributes to an increased risk of T2DM in the general population in a nonlinear dose-response pattern.

Introduction

Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its complications have risen to pandemic proportions. It is expected that the number of people living with T2DM will reach 552 million by 2030 according to the most recent estimates released by the International Diabetes Federation [1]. In line with current guidelines from the International Diabetes Federation [2], much attention is now being paid to early identification of individuals at high risk and potential prevention of T2DM. To date, established risk factors for T2DM include age, gender, hypertension, family history of diabetes, and anthropometric data (body mass index or waist circumference), and several risk scores incorporating majority of these risk factors exist [3], [4], [5]. Participants at high risk of developing T2DM according to thresholds of these risk scores are amenable to preventive measures. The pathogenesis of T2DM is however still not fully established and appears to involve multiple factors.

Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), a sensitive but nonspecific index of liver dysfunction and a biological clue of excessive alcohol intake, has been strongly linked to the development of T2DM [6], [7], [8]. Although interest in GGT as a risk marker for T2DM goes back at least several decades, this was further stimulated with the systematic review and meta-analysis by Fraser et al. [9], who quantified the prospective association of GGT with risk of incident T2DM, but assumed a log–linear relationship. Although the evidence suggests that there is a strong association between elevated baseline circulating GGT and high risk of incident T2DM, which indicates a dose-response relationship, there is uncertainty about the nature of the dose-response relationship and specifically, whether it is linear or there is a threshold effect. With available evidence suggesting that the GGT–T2DM association is apparent even within the normal range of GGT level [10], [11], it is important to establish if a threshold exists, which could potentially better identify individuals at increased risk of T2DM. In addition, since the publication of the previous review, a large number of studies have been published on the topic. Against this background, we aimed to characterize in detail the nature of the dose-response relationship between baseline GGT level and risk of T2DM in the general population by conducting a dose-response meta-analysis of available prospective data. We also conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to obtain a precise estimate of the magnitude of the association by including all relevant studies published since the previous review [9] and transformed reported risk estimates from all studies to a consistent comparison (top vs. bottom thirds of the baseline levels of GGT) to enhance comparability of the findings.

Section snippets

Data sources and searches

This systematic review and meta-analysis of studies were conducted using a predefined protocol and reported in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines [12], [13] (Appendices 1–2). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for prospective (cohort, case-cohort or “nested case control”) population-based studies that measured levels of enzymatic activity of GGT and evaluated associations between baseline circulating levels of GGT with T2DM risk up to June 2014. The computer-based searches

Study identification and selection

Our initial search identified 300 potentially relevant citations (Fig. 1). After screening the titles and abstracts, 50 articles remained for further evaluation. We reviewed and assessed these 50 articles and excluded 27 articles because (i) they had no relevant exposure or outcome (n = 17); (ii) they were not prospective (n = 9) or duplicated a previous publication from the same study (n = 1). In sum, this meta-analysis included 23 articles (Appendix 4) based on 24 unique prospective cohort

Discussion

Unlike the previous meta-analysis by Fraser et al. [9], who reported a RR of 1.92 (95% CI, 1.66–2.21) for T2DM per unit change in loge GGT in pooled analysis of fully adjusted results of 13 studies, the present meta-analysis of 16 prospective studies (contributing relevant data) provides a more detailed assessment of the dose-response nature of the association between circulating GGT level and T2DM. The findings demonstrate a nonlinear association between GGT level and risk of T2DM; the

Conclusions

Available data indicate that baseline level of GGT is directly associated with an increased risk of T2DM in the general population in a nonlinear dose-response pattern.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Andrea L. C. Schneider, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland for providing data on request. The authors also wish to gratefully acknowledge Professor Sarah Wild, Center for Population Health Science, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, UK for providing comments on the manuscript before submission.

Dr. A.A. is supported by a Rubicon grant from the Netherlands

References (47)

  • E.S. Ford et al.

    Liver enzymes and incident diabetes: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam Study

    Diabetes Care

    (2008)
  • A.L. Schneider et al.

    Liver enzymes, race, gender and diabetes risk: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

    Diabet Med

    (2013)
  • A. Abbasi et al.

    Liver function tests and risk prediction of incident type 2 diabetes: evaluation in two independent cohorts

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • A. Fraser et al.

    Alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and incident diabetes: the British Women's Heart and Health Study and meta-analysis

    Diabetes Care

    (2009)
  • Y. Doi et al.

    Liver enzymes as a predictor for incident diabetes in a Japanese population: the Hisayama study

    Obesity (Silver Spring)

    (2007)
  • D.H. Lee et al.

    Gamma-glutamyl transferase and diabetes–a 4 year follow-up study

    Diabetologia

    (2003)
  • D. Moher et al.

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

    PLoS Med

    (2009)
  • D.F. Stroup et al.

    Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology

    JAMA

    (2000)
  • Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, J. Peterson, V. Welch, M. Losos, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing...
  • N. Orsini et al.

    Generalized least squares for trend estimation of summarized dose-response data

    Stata J

    (2006)
  • F.E. Harrell et al.

    Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1988)
  • G. Chêne et al.

    Methods for summarizing the risk associations of quantitative variables in epidemiologic studies in a consistent form

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1996)
  • S. Greenland et al.

    Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1992)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text