Review
Metformin vs insulin in the management of gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.12.056Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of metformin compared with insulin in achieving glycemic control and investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus.

Methods

We searched four electronic databases from inception through December 2012. Terms for Gestational diabetes/gestational diabetes mellitus/diabetes pregnancy AND/OR Metformin/hypoglycemic drugs/Hypoglycemic Agents/Antidiabetic Medications were used in the search. Two investigators independently reviewed titles and abstracts, performed data abstraction on full articles, and assessed study quality. Meanwhile, manual search of other resources and the search on Google Scholar were also carried out to identify more related articles .Rev Man 5.0 was used to analyze the data.

Results

Six randomized clinical trials involving 1420 subjects were included. The current limited data suggested that using metformin in gestational diabetes subjects did not significantly increase adverse maternal outcomes and neonatal outcomes, also with less weight gain and neonatal hypoglycemia, but a higher incidence of premature birth.

Conclusions

Metformin will not increase the incidence of adverse maternal outcomes and neonatal outcomes.

Introduction

GDM has been defined as any degree of glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy [1].GDM is associated with an increased risk of complications for both the mother and the baby during pregnancy and birth. The prevalence of GDM varies widely depending on the population studied, but the overall estimated prevalence in the United States is 2% to 10% [2]. Treatment for GDM could reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes [3]. Historically, insulin has been the therapeutic agent of choice for controlling hyperglycemia in women with GDM who could not be controlled by medical nutrition therapy and physical activity. However, difficulty in medication administration with multiple daily injections, potential for hypoglycemia, and increase in appetite and weight make this therapeutic option difficult for many pregnant women [4].

Using oral diabetes medication in women with GDM has accumulated more clinical evidence even though they have not been formally approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for this indication [5].

Metformin is one such medication and studies have shown different outcomes with metformin in women with GDM. One study evaluating the efficacy and safety of metformin treatment in women with pregestational and gestational diabetes raised concerns about a higher perinatal mortality and a higher rate of preeclampsia [6]. However, a recent large randomized controlled trial which compared metformin with insulin in the treatment of gestational diabetes (MiG trial) suggested that metformin, alone or with supplemental insulin, was an effective and safe treatment option for women with gestational diabetes [7].

A recent systematic review concluded that oral agents are suitable for managing gestational diabetes because they achieved good glycemic control and maternal and perinatal outcomes comparable with insulin, but the meta-analysis included only two trials of metformin, and did not separate metformin and glyburide [8]. Since the use of metformin in pregnant women remains controversial, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of metformin with the aim of comparing the effects and safety of metformin in gestational diabetes mellitus with insulin.

Section snippets

Eligibility criteria and exclusion criteria

A study was included in the meta-analysis if it fulfilled the following inclusion criteria:

  • (1)

    Population was patients with gestational diabetes.

  • (2)

    Study design was a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

  • (3)

    Intervention compared metformin vs insulin.

Exclusion criteria:

  • (1)

    did not include human data;

  • (2)

    did not separate preexisting type 2 diabetes and those diagnosed with gestational diabetes;

  • (3)

    was a case report or case series.

Outcomes of interest:

Maternal outcomes were glycemic control, weight gain, cesarean

Results

Six RCTs [7], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] fulfilled the inclusion criteria and included a total of 1420 patients. The characteristics of the trials included in the analysis are shown in Table 1.

Six of the RCTs described the randomisation scheme. None of the trials were blinded. Five of the trials reported and described participant withdrawals or the reasons for loss to follow-up. None of the studies reported an intention-to-treat analysis.

Discussion

The lack of a significant difference in maternal glycemic control assessed by HbA1c and fasting blood glucose, suggests that metformin is equally effective as insulin in the management of gestational diabetes. In addition there were no differences in other indicators of maternal outcomes such as Cesarean delivery and hypertensive disorders between two treatment groups. However, weight gain of the pregnant women was significantly less with metformin [7]. Maternal gestational weight gain above

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (46)

  • Metformin is comparable to insulin for pharmacotherapy in gestational diabetes mellitus: A network meta-analysis evaluating 6046 women

    2021, Pharmacological Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    While metformin and glibenclamide (glyburide) are now frequently used, there is still no consensus about whether either of these or insulin should be first line therapy. This lack of consensus exists despite multiple head to head comparisons in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [22–25], and meta-analyses [26–32]. To date, three network meta-analyses (NMAs) have compared the three agents (supplement A) but because they did not pre-define core-outcomes, they were not definitive, though they did help somewhat in refining strategies (see Section 4).

  • Diabetes and pregnancy

    2017, FMC Formacion Medica Continuada en Atencion Primaria
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text