Intervention
Nurse-led psychological interventions to improve diabetes control: Assessing competencies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.036Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To assess whether medical nurses can deliver motivational enhancement therapy (MET) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to a competent level and whether treatment fidelity is maintained.

Methods

Training consisted of classroom teaching, written materials, a training caseload, and audio-visual feedback. We used the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI), the Revised 12-item Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS-R), and components of the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code (MISC) to assess competency and treatment fidelity. Two independent clinical psychologists who were blind to the allocation rated a random selection of 40 sessions.

Results

Six nurses were trained in both interventions. For the MET the mean (SD) scores for empathy and spirit on the MITI scale were 5.1 (0.7) and 4.6 (1.0) respectively and for CBT the total mean (SD) CTS-R score was 52.1 (7.5), which was acceptable competency in both treatments. The two interventions were distinguishable.

Conclusion

Results suggest that nurses can be trained to deliver diabetes-specific MET and CBT competently and maintain treatment fidelity.

Practice implications

Findings of this study provide preliminary evidence to suggest that nurse-led psychological interventions could be incorporated into the traditional diabetes setting.

Introduction

Sub-optimal glycaemic control (SOGC) in type 1 diabetes is common despite the effectiveness of intensive insulin therapies, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pumps and structured education programs [1], [2], [3]. Factors which can contribute to sub-optimal glycaemic control are diverse and include biological factors such as subcutaneous insulin absorption, liver function and autonomic arousal, psychological barriers such as diabetes-related anxieties around hypoglycaemia, complications, self-injecting and glucose self-testing, weight gain and low mood [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. National guidelines increasingly emphasise the need for diabetes teams to offer psychological care to empower and encourage patients towards healthier behaviour change, lifestyle modifications and effective self-care.

Current medical and structured educational models of diabetes management are based on conventional doctor/clinician–patient relationships and learning theories in which the patient is given instructions, information and advice. Psychological interventions differ from the above models of care, in that the relationship between the therapist/clinician and the patient is based on a therapeutic alliance in which they are collaborating as equal partners to identify unhelpful thoughts, feelings and behaviours, conscious and/or unconscious, with the aim of replacing these with more helpful psychological processes.

There is emerging evidence of the effectiveness of psychological treatments in improving glycaemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes [9]. Expert mental health providers such as psychologists are a costly and scarce resource and they may not always be best placed to deliver psychological care to most people with type 1 diabetes as the psychologist often needs a good working knowledge of diabetes. On the other hand, diabetes professionals are more readily accessible to people with diabetes and adding psychological treatments to their skills may be a more effective and convenient intervention to help patients improve self-care.

A recent review in type 2 diabetes suggests that brief psychological treatments delivered by general clinicians was as effective at improving glycaemic control at a clinically significant level as expert mental health providers. These promising findings need to be interpreted cautiously as the studies were mostly underpowered and older studies seemed to be more effective than recent ones. An additional dilemma for the diabetes clinician and patient is that strict or tight glycaemic control may be associated with increased cardiovascular and mortality risks [10]. In a systematic review of 13 RCTs of the effectiveness of psychological treatments in improving glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes, only one study had trained diabetes nurses to deliver the intervention [11]. The results from this study showed that the intervention resulted in better psychological outcomes but as glycaemic control was on average within the recommended range there were no observed improvements in this.

The present study examines whether nurses could be trained to competently deliver two brief psychological treatments in the context of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) [12]. The aim of this 3-arm parallel RCT was to test the effectiveness of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) and MET with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) compared to usual diabetes care. MET is a brief focused (usually 1–4 sessions) counseling method for enhancing motivation to change problematic health behaviours by exploring and resolving the ambivalence about change [13]. MET is the treatment of choice for alcohol misuse and smoking and there is emerging evidence of its effectiveness in diabetes [9], [14]. A recent survey of psychological needs for people with diabetes suggested that MET was probably one of the first choices for interventions to support people with mild difficulties in trying to improve glycaemic control, especially in those without formal or clinical psychiatric disorders such depressive disorders, eating disorders, addictions or personality disturbance [15]. CBT is a longer therapy (usually a 6–18 sessions) that aims to enable the patient to identify, challenge and substitute unhelpful cognitions and behaviours with more constructive ones [16]. There have been several trials suggesting that CBT can be an effective intervention for the treatment of depression in diabetes [14] but less evidence that it is effective in improving glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes [9].

Section snippets

The training programme

In the UK there is no integrated training programme on psychotherapeutic skills for diabetes professionals. We developed a curriculum that would be easy to translate into the clinical setting. The curriculum in this study had two components; the nurses were educated in specific psychotherapy skills and then tested as to whether they had acquired these skills in other words: were they now trained in them. The principles underlying the curriculum were as follows: the training and the intervention

Nurse recruitment and training

Six nurses were recruited between May 2003 and February 2006 in two rotations of 3. They were all female and had at least 3 years post-qualification experience in the field of diabetes to varying degrees; there were 3 diabetes specialist nurses, two general nurses and one mental health nurse with experience of delivering CBT in diabetes.

Therapy session attendance and selection for rating

From the participants allocated to the MET group (n = 117), 88.9% (n = 104) attended the third session. From the participants allocated to the MET with CBT group (n =

Discussion

This paper describes a training programme for the delivery of a nurse-led therapy as part of a multi-centre RCT for adults with type 1 diabetes and persistent sub-optimal glycaemic control. We recruited nurses from a variety of backgrounds and expertise and adapted their training and supervision to their needs and competency levels. We found that the nurses developed satisfactory to high levels of competency in the behaviour change techniques and psychological skills used in these treatments.

As

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the funders who supported this study, the Health Technology Assessment Programme; the diabetes physicians who gave their permission and enduring support, the nurse therapists who delivered the treatments and the clinical raters who devoted their time and energy in order to ensure a rigorous analysis.

Grant support: By the United Kingdom Department of Health's Health Technology Assessment Programme (project no. 01/17/05).

References (45)

  • P. Ciechanowski et al.

    Depression and diabetes: impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs

    Arch Intern Med

    (2000)
  • K. Winkley et al.

    Psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Brit Med J

    (2006)
  • H.C. Gerstein et al.

    Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • F. Pouwer et al.

    Monitoring of psychological well-being in outpatients with diabetes. Effects on mood, HbA1c and the patient's evaluation of the quality of diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial

    Diabetes Care

    (2001)
  • K. Ismail et al.

    Motivational enhancement therapy with and without cognitive behavioural therapy to treat type 1 diabetes: a randomised control trial

    Ann Intern Med

    (2008)
  • W. Miller et al.

    Motivational interviewing: preparing people to change addictive behaviour

    (2002)
  • T. Nicholson et al.

    National guidelines for psychological care in diabetes: how mindful have we been?

    Diabetic Med

    (2009)
  • A. Beck

    Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders

    (1976)
  • C. Trepka et al.

    Therapist competence and outcome of cognitive therapy for depression

    Cognitive Ther Res

    (2004)
  • G. Welch

    The Accu-Check Interview software program

    (2000)
  • L.A. King

    The health benefits of writing about life goals

    Pers Soc Psych Bull

    (2001)
  • H. Markus et al.

    Possible selves

    Am Psychol

    (1986)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Feasibility of telephone-delivered therapy for common mental health difficulties embedded in pediatric epilepsy clinics

      2021, Epilepsy and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Children with epilepsy and their families want a therapist that understands the daily challenges associated with medication, seizures, and learning difficulties [15] and frequently turn to their epilepsy nurse to discuss concerns regarding emotional and behavioral difficulties [16]. Research in other areas has demonstrated that evidence-based therapies delivered by nurses working in physical health settings can be both effective and highly acceptable to patients [17–19]. This paper reports on the second phase of a five-year research program to develop and trial telephone-delivered therapy for common mental health difficulties integrated within pediatric epilepsy clinics and delivered by healthcare professionals (HCPs) who do not have significant prior formal experience of psychological therapy.

    • Psychological skills training to support diabetes self-management: Qualitative assessment of nurses’ experiences

      2016, Primary Care Diabetes
      Citation Excerpt :

      The results of this study will be reported elsewhere. This evaluation is deliberately being conducted before the main quantitative results are known to minimise researcher bias in the interviews and interpretation of the data [13]. MI is a brief (usually 1–4 sessions) counselling method for enhancing motivation to change and problematic health behaviours by exploring and resolving ambivalence about change [14].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text