Abstract
Self-completion instruments assessing subjective health are increasingly being used to measure patient outcome. However, there is very little evidence as yet of existing instruments' responsiveness to change. This paper describes a study to evaluate the responsiveness to change of a self-completion instrument for the measurement of clinical outcome in patients with diabetes. A prospective follow-up study of 48 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes commencing insulin therapy was carried out, with assessments at baseline (i.e. pre-intervention), 6 weeks and 3 months post-intervention. The outcome measures used were the changes in scores on the self-completion instrument for symptom level, physical function, energy, depression, psychological distress and barriers to activity, HbA1c, non-fasting serum cholesterol and the body mass index (BMI). There were significant improvements in HbA1c and non-fasting serum cholesterol and worsening of the BMI, as expected. The self-completion instrument detected significant improvements in patient-reported symptoms within 6 weeks of the intervention (p<0.01) and in energy levels (p<0.05). There is evidence from this study of the self-completion instrument's ability to respond to change and it has potential for use in evaluative studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowling A. Measuring Health. A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991.
Wilkin D, Hallam L, Doggett A-M. Measures of Need and Outcome for Primary Health Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Deyo R, Centor R. Assessing the responsiveness to change of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis, 39(11): 897–906.
Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, Mowat A. The importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures. Qual Health Care 1992; 1: 89–93.
Cox DJ, Irvine A, Gonder-Federick L et al. Fear of hypoglycaemia: quantification, validation and utilization. Diabetes Care 1987; 10: 617–621.
Bradley C, Lewis KS. Measures of psychological wellbeing and treatment satisfaction developed from the responses of people with tablet-treated diabetes. Diabetic Med 1990; 7(5): 445–451.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483.
Hunt S, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring Health Status. London: Croom Helm, 1986.
Hyland ME, Finnis S, Irvine SH. A scale for assessing quality of life in adult asthma sufferers. J Psychosom Res 1991; 35(1): 99–110.
Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey instrument: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 1993; 306: 1437–1440.
Hammond GS, Aoki TT. Measurement of health status in diabetic patients. Diabetes Impact Measurement Scales. Diabetes Care 1992; 15(4): 469–477.
Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118(8): 622–629.
Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Jones D et al. Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment. BMJ 1992; 305: 1145–1148.
Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Issues in quality of life measurement in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1991; 12: 81S–90S.
Cox DR, Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher AE et al. Quality of life assessment: can we keep it simple? J R Stat Soc 1992; 155(3): 353–375.
McColl E, Steen IN, Meadows KA et al. Developing outcome measures for ambulatory care–an application to asthma and diabetes. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41(10): 1339–1348.
Meadows KA, Steen IN, McColl E et al. The Diabetes Health Profile (DHP): a new instrument for assessing the psychological profile of insulin requiring patients–development and psychometric evaluation. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 242–254.
Goddijn P, Bilo H, Meadows K et al. The validity and reliability of the Diabetes Health Profile (DHP) in NIDD patients referred for insulin therapy. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 433–442.
Department of Public Health Medicine. University of Hull. Outcome Measures for Ambulatory Care. Final Report of the Ambulatory Care Research Programme. Hull: University of Hull, 1996.
Genuth S. Insulin use in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1990; 13(12): 1240–1264.
Kudlacek S, Schernthaner G. The effect of insulin treatment on HbA1c, body weight and lipids in type 2 diabetic patients with secondary failure to sulfonylureas. A five year follow up study. Hormone Metabolic Res 1992; 24(10): 478–483.
Taylor R, Foster B, Kyne-Grzebalski DK, Vanderpump M. Insulin regimens for the non-insulin dependent: impact on diurnal metabolic state and quality of life. Diabetic Med 1994; (6): 551–557.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–370.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: a Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Likert R. A technique for the development of attitude scales. Educat Psychol Measure 1952; 12: 313–315.
Kraemer HC, Thiemann S. How Many Subjects? Statistical Power Analysis in Research. London: Sage, 1987.
Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. London: McGraw Hill, 1988.
SPSS Reference Guide: Release 4. Chicago: SPSS Inc., 1990.
Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1987.
Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 171–178.
Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopaedic evaluation. Med Care 1992; 30: 917–925.
Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Russell IT. SF-36 health survey instrument: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions. Qual Health Care 1994; 3: 186–192.
Bradley C. The Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: a Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice. Chur: Harwood Academic Press, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitty, P., Steen, N., Eccles, M. et al. A new self-completion outcome measure for diabetes: is it responsive to change?. Qual Life Res 6, 407–413 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018443628933
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018443628933