Elsevier

Kidney International

Volume 47, Issue 6, June 1995, Pages 1703-1720
Kidney International

Clinical Investigation
Effect of intensive therapy on the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1995.236Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Effect of intensive therapy on the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) has demonstrated that intensive diabetes treatment delays the onset and slows the progression of retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy in patients with IDDM. A detailed description of the effects of this treatment on diabetic nephropathy is presented here. In the primary prevention cohort, intensive treatment reduced the mean adjusted risk of the cumulative incidence of microalbuminuria (≥28 µg/min) by 34% (95% CI 2, 56%; P = 0.04). Furthermore, intensive treatment decreased the albumin excretion rate (AER) by 15% after the first year of therapy (6.5 vs. 7.7 µg/min, P < 0.001). Thereafter the rates of change for AER within each treatment group were no different from zero, retaining a constant difference in AER between groups in the trial. In the secondary intervention cohort with baseline AER <28 µg/min, intensive therapy reduced the mean adjusted risk of microalbuminuria (≥28 µg/min) by 43% (95% CI 21, 58%; P < 0.0001); the risk of a more advanced level of microalbuminuria (≥70 µg/min) by 56% (95% CI 26, 74%; P = 0.002); and the risk of clinical albuminuria (≥208 µg/min) by 56% (95% CI 18, 76%; P < 0.01). In the secondary intervention cohort, values for AER at year 1 were identical at 9 µg/min, but the 6.5% change per year in the conventional group greatly exceeded the rate of change of -0.3% in the intensive group (P < 0.001). Among the 73 secondary cohort subjects with AER levels ≥28 µg/min but ≤139 µg/min at baseline, the reduction of progression to clinical albuminuria with intensive therapy was not statistically significant. The longitudinal treatment effect of conventional versus intensive therapy (11.0% vs. 2.5% per year, respectively, P = 0.087) was similar in magnitude to that among patients with AER <28 µg/min at baseline. For the primary, secondary and combined cohorts, there were no significant differences in the rates of change in creatinine clearance (CCr) between treatment groups during the study. Only seven subjects in the entire study (2 intensive, 5 conventional) developed urinary AER ≥208 µg/min coupled with a CCr <70 ml/min/1.73 m2. Neither the rate of change of blood pressure nor the appearance of hypertension (BP > 140/90 mm Hg) differed significantly between treatment groups in the primary, secondary or combined cohorts. The beneficial effect of intensive therapy on the development of microalbuminuria was consistent in subgroups defined by baseline variables including age, diabetes duration, baseline HbA1c, level of retinopathy, neuropathy, and the presence or absence of hyperfiltration (CCr < 130 or ≥130 ml/min/1.73 m2). Even after adjustment for pregnancy, female subjects nearly demonstrated (P = 0.06) a smaller treatment effect than male subjects. In summary, intensive therapy reduced the cumulative incidence and overall risk for the development of microalbuminuria and clinical albuminuria in both the primary prevention and secondary intervention DCCT cohorts. The consistent beneficial effect of intensive therapy may prevent the onset and will at least delay progression of nephropathy; it may also delay or prevent the development of advanced renal disease in IDDM patients.

Cited by (0)

1

A complete listing of members of the DCCT Research Group is available in Arch Ophthamol 113:49-51, 1995.