Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Brachial-ankle vs carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity as a determinant of cardiovascular structure and function

Abstract

Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) is a validated marker of arterial stiffening over the central arteries. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (ba-PWV) integrates the mechanical properties from both the central and peripheral arteries and may be more representative than cf-PWV as arterial load for left ventricle (LV). We compared ba-PWV with cf-PWV for the association of cardiovascular structure and function in 320 subjects with various degrees of abnormality in cardiac structure and function. ba-PWV (by oscillometric technique) and cf-PWV (by tonometric technique) were measured simultaneously, and were highly correlated (r=0.79, P<0.001). Both ba-PWV and cf-PWV were significantly correlated with LV mass, but the correlation was better with ba-PWV (r=0.29 vs r=0.22, P=0.0219). While ba-PWV and cf-PWV were similarly significantly correlated with LV end-systolic elastance and mitral E/A ratio, ba-PWV had better correlation with isovolumic relaxation constant (r=0.34 vs r=0.27, P=0.0202) than cf-PWV. In addition, the correlation was also significantly stronger with ba-PWV than with cf-PWV for other indices of arterial stiffness, including carotid incremental modulus (r=0.59 vs 0.50, P=0.0013), effective arterial elastance (r=0.41 vs r=0.33, P=0.0081) and carotid augmentation index (r=0.38 vs r=0.32, P=0.0368). In conclusion, ba-PWV correlates better with LV mass and diastolic function and other indices of arterial function than cf-PWV, probably because ba-PWV encompasses a greater territory of arterial tree than cf-PWV.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kass DA, Kelly RP . Ventriculo-arterial coupling: concepts, assumptions, and applications. Ann Biomed Eng 1992; 20: 41–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2001; 37: 1236–1241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cruickshank K, Riste L, Anderson SG, Wright JS, Dunn G, Gosling RG . Aortic pulse-wave velocity and its relationship to mortality in diabetes and glucose intolerance: an integrated index of vascular function? Circulation 2002; 106: 2085–2090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blacher J, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, London GM . Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease. Circulation 1999; 99: 2434–2439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kass DA . Ventricular arterial stiffening: integrating the pathophysiology. Hypertension 2005; 46: 185–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen CH, Nakayama M, Nevo E, Fetics BJ, Maughan WL, Kass DA . Coupled systolic-ventricular and vascular stiffening with age implications for pressure regulation and cardiac reserve in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1221–1227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen CH, Nakayama M, Talbot M, Nevo E, Fetics B, Gerstenblith G et al. Verapamil acutely reduces ventricular-vascular stiffening and improves aerobic exercise performance in elderly individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1602–1609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawaguchi M, Hay I, Fetics B, Kass DA . Combined ventricular systolic and arterial stiffening in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: implications for systolic and diastolic reserve limitations. Circulation 2003; 107: 714–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CH, Lin YP, Yu WC, Yang WC, Ding YA . Volume status and blood pressure during long-term hemodialysis: role of ventricular stiffness. Hypertension 2003; 42: 257–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, Rasmussen S, Thijs L, Ibsen H et al. Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population. Circulation 2006; 113: 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mattace-Raso FU, van der Cammen TJ, Hofman A, van Popele NM, Bos ML, Schalekamp MA et al. Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation 2006; 113: 657–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamashina A, Tomiyama H, Takeda K, Tsuda H, Arai T, Hirose K et al. Validity, reproducibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement. Hypertens Res 2002; 25: 359–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sugawara J, Hayashi K, Yokoi T, Cortez-Cooper MY, DeVan AE, Anton MA et al. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity: an index of central arterial stiffness? J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19: 401–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng HM, Yu WC, Chen CH . Prevalence of arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis in stable patients at a cardiovascular outpatient clinic: potential for better care. J Chin Med Assoc 2006; 69: 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomiyama H, Yamashina A, Arai T, Hirose K, Koji Y, Chikamori T et al. Influences of age and gender on results of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement – a survey of 12517 subjects. Atherosclerosis 2003; 166: 303–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chuang SY, Chen CH, Cheng CM, Chou P . Combined use of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and ankle-brachial index for fast assessment of arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis in a community. Int J Cardiol 2005; 98: 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin YP, Yu WC, Hsu TL, Ding PY, Yang WC, Chen CH . The extracellular fluid-to-intracellular fluid volume ratio is associated with large-artery structure and function in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 42: 990–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Devereux RB, Lutas EM, Casale PN, Kligfield P, Eisenberg RR, Hammond IW et al. Standardization of M-mode echocardiographic left ventricular anatomic measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 1222–1230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen CH, Fetics B, Nevo E, Rochitte CE, Chiou KR, Ding PA et al. Noninvasive single-beat determination of left ventricular end-systolic elastance in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 2028–2034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mulvagh S, Quinones MA, Kleiman NS, Cheirif J, Zoghbi WA . Estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure from Doppler transmitral flow velocity in cardiac patients independent of systolic performance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 112–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Salonen R, Haapanen A, Salonen JT . Measurement of intima-media thickness of common carotid arteries with high-resolution B-mode ultrasonography: inter- and intra-observer variability. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17: 225–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schulman SP, Lakatta EG, Fleg JL, Lakatta L, Becker LC, Gerstenblith G . Age-related decline in left ventricular filling at rest and excercise. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1992; 263: H1932–H1938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McIntyre M, MacFadyen RJ, Meredith PA, Brouard R, Reid JL . Dose-ranging study of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan (SR 47436/BMS-186295) on blood pressure and neurohormonal effects in salt-deplete men. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1996; 28: 101–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. London GM, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Pannier B, Safar ME, Day M et al. Cardiac and arterial interactions in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 600–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen CH, Ting CT, Nussbacher A, Nevo E, Kass DA, Pak P et al. Validation of carotid artery tonometry as a means of estimating augmentation index of ascending aortic pressure. Hypertension 1996; 27: 168–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lin YP, Chen CH, Hsu TL, Yang WC, Ding YA . Sequential tonometry as a practical method to estimate truncal pulse wave velocity. Chung Hua I Hsueh Tsa Chih (Taipei) 2001; 64: 693–702.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, Nizam A . Applied Regression Analysis and Multivariable Methods, 3th edn, Duxburry Press: New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF . McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretic, Experimental and Clinical Principles, 4th edn, Arnold: London, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mitchell GF, Parise H, Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, Vita JA et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension 2004; 43: 1239–1245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohn JN, Finkelstein S, McVeigh G, Morgan D, LeMay L, Robinson J et al. Noninvasive pulse wave analysis for the early detection of vascular disease. Hypertension 1995; 26: 503–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Grey E, Bratteli C, Glasser SP, Alinder C, Finkelstein SM, Lindgren BR et al. Reduced small artery but not large artery elasticity is an independent risk marker for cardiovascular events. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16: 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schillaci G, Pirro M, Mannarino MR, Pucci G, Savarese G, Franklin SS et al. Relation between renal function within the normal range and central and peripheral arterial stiffness in hypertension. Hypertension 2006; 48: 616–621.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Henry RM, Kostense PJ, Spijkerman AM, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Heine RJ et al. Arterial stiffness increases with deteriorating glucose tolerance status: the Hoorn Study. Circulation 2003; 107: 2089–2095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hatsuda S, Shoji T, Shinohara K, Kimoto E, Mori K, Fukumoto S et al. Regional arterial stiffness associated with ischemic heart disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Atheroscler Thromb 2006; 13: 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pannier B, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, London GM . Stiffness of capacitive and conduit arteries: prognostic significance for end-stage renal disease patients. Hypertension 2005; 45: 592–596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Munakata M, Ito N, Nunokawa T, Yoshinaga K . Utility of automated brachial ankle pulse wave velocity measurements in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16: 653–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Imanishi R, Seto S, Toda G, Yoshida M, Ohtsuru A, Koide Y et al. High brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity is an independent predictor of the presence of coronary artery disease in men. Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tomiyama H, Koji Y, Yambe M, Shiina K, Motobe K, Yamada J et al. Brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity is a simple and independent predictor of prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Circ J 2005; 69: 815–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Borlaug BA, Rodeheffer RJ, Kass DA . Age- and gender-related ventricular-vascular stiffening: a community-based study. Circulation 2005; 112: 2254–2262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by serial grants from the National Science Council (NSC 95–2314-B-010-029), the intramural grants from the Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Grant No. VGH94–203) and grants in aid from the Research Foundation of Cardiovascular Medicine (95–01–004), Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C-H Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, WC., Chuang, SY., Lin, YP. et al. Brachial-ankle vs carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity as a determinant of cardiovascular structure and function. J Hum Hypertens 22, 24–31 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1002259

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1002259

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links