[Validity and reliability of the screening questionnaire for geriatric depression used in the Mexican Health and Age Study]

Salud Publica Mex. 2007 Jul-Aug;49(4):256-62. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342007000400005.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Objective: To assess the validity and reliability of a geriatric depression questionnaire used in the Mexican Health and Age Study (MHAS).

Methods: The study was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ) clinic from May 2005 to March 2006. This depression screening nine-item questionnaire was validated using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) (fourth revised version) and Yesavage's 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) criteria. The instrument belongs to the MHAS, a prospective panel study of health and aging in Mexico.

Results: A total of 199 subjects 65 years of age and older participated in the validation process (median age= 79.5 years). MHAS questionnaire result was significantly correlated to the clinical depression diagnosis (p<0.001) and to the GDS-15 score (p<0.001). Internal consistency was adequate (alpha coefficient: 0.74). The cutoff point > or = 5/9 points yielded an 80.7% and 68.7% sensitivity and specificity respectively. The fidelity for the test retest was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient= 0.933). Finally, the Bland and Altman agreement points indicated a difference 0.22 percent points between test retest.

Conclusion: The MHAS questionnaire is valid and trustworthy, and allows screening in the research field for the presence of depression in the elderly.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Depression / diagnosis*
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • Education
  • Female
  • Geriatric Assessment*
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Male
  • Marital Status
  • Mass Screening
  • Mexico
  • Prospective Studies
  • ROC Curve
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*