Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Drivers of weight loss in a CDC-recognized digital diabetes prevention program
  1. Stefanie L Painter1,
  2. Wei Lu1,
  3. Jennifer Schneider1,
  4. Roberta James1,
  5. Bimal Shah1,2
  1. 1Livongo Health, Mountain View, California, USA
  2. 2Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Stefanie L Painter; spainter{at}livongo.com

Abstract

Introduction To investigate the impact of the digital Livongo Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) on weight at 12 months, understand participants’ self-monitoring behaviors associated with greater weight loss, and evaluate the impact of coaching interactions on more frequent self-monitoring behaviors.

Research design and methods A retrospective analysis was performed using data from 2037 participants enrolled in the Livongo DPP who completed lesson 1 and recorded a starting weight during 2016–2017. Self-monitoring behaviors, including weigh-ins, food logging, activity, and coach–participant interactions, were analyzed at 6 and 12 months. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on those who were highly engaged versus those minimally engaged. Multiple regression analysis was performed using demographic, self-monitoring, and lesson attendance data to determine predictors of weight loss at 12 months and coaching impact on self-monitoring.

Results Participants had a mean age of 50 years (SD ±12), with a starting weight of 94 kg (SD ±21), were college-educated (78%), and were female (74%). Overall, participants lost on average 5.1% of their starting weight. Highly engaged participants lost 6.6% of starting body weight, with 25% losing ≥10% at 12 months. Logistic regression analysis showed each submitted food log was associated with 0.23 kg (p<0.05) weight loss, each lesson completed was associated with 0.14 kg (p<0.05) weight loss, and a week of 150 active minutes was associated with 0.1 kg (p<0.01) weight loss. One additional coach–participant message each week was associated with 1.4 more food logs per week, 1.6% increase in weeks with four or more weigh-ins, and a 2.7% increase in weeks with 150 min of activity.

Conclusions Food logging had the largest impact on weight loss, followed by lesson engagement and physical activity. Future studies should examine further opportunities to deliver nutrition-based content to increase and sustain weight loss for DPP.

  • pre-diabetes
  • weight loss
  • self-monitoring
  • lifestyle management
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Conception and design of the study: SLP, WL, JS, RJ, and BS. Acquisition of data: WL and RJ. Analysis and/or interpretation of data: SLP, WL, RJ, and BS. Drafting the manuscript: SLP, WL, RJ, and BS. Revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content: SLP, WL, JS, RJ, and BS. Approval of the version of the manuscript to be published: SLP, WL, JS, RJ, and BS.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests All authors are employed by Livongo Health.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Ethics approval Exemption was granted by the Western Internal Review Board (#1-1039270-1) due to its retrospective analysis design and use of de-identified data set.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.